Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My opinion, ethanol makes more power due to the lazy way it burns, right through the piston stroke, which in turn makes more torque. That's why you can pump so much timing in without going backwards or detonating. As the exhaust is cooler and less dense (less carbon?) it actually causes more lag than a petrol tune I have noticed.

i was reading something a few days ago where a guy had put e85 in his mildly tuned honda with factory engine mgnt, his friend had the same car with the same mods but on pulp so they raced. His friend got the jump on him by about a car length.. He caught him in second then pulled 2 car lengths in 3rd..

He monitored the car for a few weeks then gave up cause he didnt want to do damage or install a piggyback :down:

i assumed it was cause it wasnt tuned, but maybe it has more to do with what your saying..but if its less dense why are egts rising?

Not to mention when I first put e85 in the tank, we gave the car a full pass without a retune and it made around 10kw more over the 98 pass directly beforehand

(this wasn't at status)

No its still in its box at the moment . I wouldn't mind giving EFlex a go in that car because it does so few miles that an exotic fuel wouldn't be a problem . It has 740s a Z32 and PFC already , and a 33 GTR pump .

I'm wondering if EFlex and a bar of boost would give it the 250-260 RWKWs .

Also people keep asking about the mythical perfect RB25 turbo and they want to hang an RWKW number on it . Id prefer people to have an "adequate" performance level because a set number seems to bother them . If they get it their chuffed and if they don't they're crestfallen . The performance level could be great for them but its the number that worries them .

This is a personal hack formula and quite conservative , I think along the lines of 100Kw/Liter capacity being quite good ie RB20-200 RB25-250 and RB30-300 . Its not difficult to think that if you throw an extra 50 Kw at each engine size you possibly risk losing that nice bottom squirt road cars thrive on .

In the case of E70-E85 you can possibly get a bit without increasing the boost pressure and that most likely comes from more efficient combustion - timing set around best torque rather than best detonation protection on PULP .

The trouble with going larger than the 100Kw/L state of tune is that you begin to need larger turbine housings biased more towards high performance exhaust flow than lower engine speed boost response , and so an unhappy compromise starts to set in .

Typical examples might be say RB20+GTRS/RB25+GT3076R/RB30+GT3582R . Now you can come back on turbine housing size on all except the GTRS and unfortunately its the one you can't easily go larger on either .

Personally on my hack formula to not really lose anything but gain everywhere it looks more like RB20+GT2530/RB25+GTRS/RB30+GT3076R . Now as mentioned not much can be done with the GTRSs turbine housing aside from flange adapting a T28 flanged 0.86 housing but you can certainly use a 1.06 GT30 housing on an RB30 with a GT3076R .

With turbos its virtually always the hot side that causes all the grief , the cold sides by comparison are generally easy . 16yrs ago I wanted T3 flanged GT30 IW turbine housings , now they are here but now I want them twin scroll and IW . I still want that 60mm NS111 turbine in 76 trim and I'm off to another board to chase more on them .

A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Did you pay with a credit card? I'd be putting a charge back through then finding a new sparky to sort it out. 
    • If you mean the alarm immobiliser; theyre internal to the alarm itself which makes that difficult; I couldnt even see where he put it; its not in the same place as last time; but with all black wiring it might be very challenging to trace  I had someone turn the key for me as I know it only primes for a couple of seconds As my post above; I am getting no voltage to the pump at all; but I am testing continuity of the power line (SB) from the pump plug to the relay fine. As well as the negative from the pump plug to a 12V constant.    Yeah; he blammed the no start on a bad battery; said I needed to get a new battery and it'll start. Turns out the battery drained because the tail lights had been on for half the day during the install (the rubber cushion on the brake switch gave out while he was testing it as I have a picture of the car from that morning with the tail lights off..i've replaced that). The battery was turning over the engine just fine for a long time; but got low since lights were draining it so it was too low to test a start after he finished. I bought a new one on his advice...$250 wasted. My original battery charged up just fine and is healthy.    It was running perfectly fine when I messed up the old alarm (programmed out the remotes). He couldnt start it after removing the old alarm; my assumption is that when he unhooked it; he didnt bridge the circuit back when trying to start it. Its always been perfectly fine. The ECU swap and pump were 2 years ago. It's never missed a beat in that time. 
    • This is a big issue for me without the diff. I just have zero drive from the passenger side when drivers side has no traction. Bec's parents place has a crazy steep driveway with odd camber and I have never been able to get up. My bro-in-law's 130i with an (unknown brand) LSD gets up fine as does their dad's Hiace. My car stays at the bottom. We have other odd camber roads around here as we're elevated a bit and if it's raining I can get totally stuck around some hairpins. 
    • Yeah, I am super excited for this.
    • Was the car running before he touched the car?
×
×
  • Create New...