Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Have had the opportunity to buy back a car a built many years ago for less than half its value, so am folding up the JZR33 project.

Car is a 93 GTS-T, gunmetal in colour, manual, 138ks, IMMACULATE interior and VERY GOOD CONDITION exterior. M spec front bar, S1 and S2 wing supplied, east bear side skirts.

Not repairable write off, not defected, clear title, etc.

What its missing:

Long motor

Coilpacks

Fuel rail/injectors

AC pump

Alternator

Exhaust manifold/turbo/full exhaust

Gearbox/mount/crossmember/fork/speedo drive/reverse switch

Brake calipers/rotors/softlines

WHAT IS NOT MENTIONED IS ON/IN THE CAR.

Pics to come, it is very tidy and will not disapoint.

Price is $2000, very firm.

Thanks,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/370326-fs-r33-rolling-shell-nsw/
Share on other sites

First photo, taken just before the motor was stripped (thus being in the backyard not the front).

Has sat around for a while since but otherwise same condition bar a wash and wax.

Rims NOT included, but ill sort something to come with it.

post-43588-0-55028800-1310097656_thumb.jpg

Would suit someone whos smashed theirs and wants to SAVE money repairing it OR someone whos car just isnt as tidy as mine and also wants to make money.

Remember you buy mine, swap your motor/box/brakes and part yours out for quite possibly more than your outlay on mine. No way there isnt 2k worth of bits on even a smashed shell, I just dont have the time, space or heart to wreck mine.

More photos for those who seem to think the cars a transformer, looks good in one photo and turns into trash monster extreme in the next.

Enjoy.

post-43588-0-47436300-1310362245_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-44788200-1310362249_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-70267000-1310362253_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-90087600-1310362257_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-30476900-1310362263_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-76452800-1310362269_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-20141500-1310362273_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-86652700-1310362278_thumb.jpg

Haha thanks mate.

You could come up for the drive and take a look, if u like it hire a trailer while your here and return it to a Vic Depot. Don't think it would cost more than 400 in fuel and hire, hell when you see the boot full of spares you'll be laughing at the value!

Take care mate :)

Haha, mate I think everyones just waiting on their tax return.

Would you believe I had some bawk at the fact its got no motor or box lol.. Like didnt you read the thread buddy?

More like they wanted the opportunity to act bashed and offer me a 3 digit figure LOL *sigh* :rolleyes:

lol thanks mate,

Everyones waiting on that infamous tax cheque!

Anytime soon haha

EDIT: turns out the car only has 127ks! Dunno how I got that mixed up but I hadnt looked in a while.

DEPOSIT TAKEN!

Going to a good home, am happy for that.

Thanks to all interested and sorry I couldnt help get everyones cars back on the road for such a good price :( First in best dressed I'm afraid.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...