Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah you can roll a bogged guard...gotta be very careful that's all, and be prepared to touch up. Paint can crack anyway without bog there. If guard roller is good it'll only crack in the part that gets rolled and then you can't really see it.

Mine needed rolling front and rear FYI

But I'm running 265's on the back and 235's on the front.

They were only just rubbing, rears rubbed when going over harsh bumps and fronts rubbed when turning

Car1.jpg

Car2.jpg

Camber.jpg

thats supposedly 2 degrees of rear camber (According to pedders) looks like more but

Edited by 89CAL
  • 2 months later...

sorry to bring this thread back up, how will 17x8+33 and 17x9+37 look guys? i just want something to sit good without needing spacers, i am also going to have camber arms on the rear and if anything ill get the front rolled

these are the specs they have in stock as im most likely going through this dealership, its giving me a headache trying to work out what to get :wacko: i just dont want something to sit inside my guards to much

The 17” D1R’s come in an 8, 9, 10 option.

17 x 8 is in an +33 offset.

17 x 9 comes in +37, +17 and -4.

17 x 10 comes in a +15.

The matt black in 17 x 9 +17 and 17 x 10 +15.

See my previous post for side pic. it needed the guards rolled but thats all, no camber arms.

2011090421454130.jpg

oh yeahh i see i might get 17x9+17 all round then. all would the same size all round look shit?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...