Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

in ACT its 35% (+/- 5%) so technically 30% transparency can slide but 29% is over the limit.

In NA catergory vehicles (van and utes) you can have any tint you want on any glass behind the drive, the front 2 windows must still meet the 35%.

you cant have any kind of film below that little marker on your winscreen.

as for reflective/metallic/mirror tint you can't have more that 8% reflective (unless its on the back of a ute or van, in which case you can paint in the windows if you like)

15% is pretty dark, you'll find yourself putting the window down at night just to see out

in ACT its 35% (+/- 5%) so technically 30% transparency can slide but 29% is over the limit.

In NA catergory vehicles (van and utes) you can have any tint you want on any glass behind the drive, the front 2 windows must still meet the 35%.

you cant have any kind of film below that little marker on your winscreen.

as for reflective/metallic/mirror tint you can't have more that 8% reflective (unless its on the back of a ute or van, in which case you can paint in the windows if you like)

15% is pretty dark, you'll find yourself putting the window down at night just to see out

I defer to this excellent post

in ACT its 35% (+/- 5%) so technically 30% transparency can slide but 29% is over the limit.

In NA catergory vehicles (van and utes) you can have any tint you want on any glass behind the drive, the front 2 windows must still meet the 35%.

you cant have any kind of film below that little marker on your winscreen.Your awesome :) haha yeah it is pretty dark :( but as long as it looks good, right? :D hehe

as for reflective/metallic/mirror tint you can't have more that 8% reflective (unless its on the back of a ute or van, in which case you can paint in the windows if you like)

15% is pretty dark, you'll find yourself putting the window down at night just to see out

When I bought my car from a dude in QLD, it had 5% tint on every window except the windscreen.

don't even consider going that dark, it was STUPID. Couldn't see a thing through them at night, and could barely seen into them even during the day.

Whether you like it or not is one thing, I for one thought it looked awesome from the outside. Fact remains, you CANNOT see through it in either direction at night, and it's illegal. You'd be stupid to have a car that gets driven in any kind of darkness with that kind of tint on the door-windows.

Yeah, you can see OUT at night but only barely, far from safe or advisable.

However if you want to be a cocky smartass as you've been in the past, I'd suggest taking it elsewhere. The guy was asking for advice, which you gave. We don't want you to hang around stroking it over having such good eyesight.

Yeah, you can see OUT at night but only barely, far from safe or advisable.

However if you want to be a cocky smartass as you've been in the past, I'd suggest taking it elsewhere. The guy was asking for advice, which you gave. We don't want you to hang around stroking it over having such good eyesight.

Oh and he I was thinking it was your calling me stupid in the first place.

If you dont like a retort dont start it.

Have I been bad in the past boo hoo get over it

Edited by waxracing

Hahaha you guys are funny lol yeah I'm almost struggling seeing out of the 15% at night.. don't get me wrong.. it looks SEXY! i think maybe a bit lighter then that youl be okay.. but i suggest just goin with the legal limit.. I'm sorta regreting mine lol

Oh and he I was thinking it was your calling me stupid in the first place.

If you dont like a retort dont start it.

Have I been bad in the past boo hoo get over it

You're the one who got butthurt last time buddy, but whatever works huh. I didn't argue with you either, given your point was "love it" and I agreed it looks awesome.

Yeah 15% would be a bit much still at night, if only it was possible to get something (cheap) completely black from the outside but barely a shade darker from the inside...

who is this bender? cos his saying that with 5% of the visible light transmission at night, which means 95% of visible light is blocked out by the tint that he can see clear as day (night), i dont think Troys the one with his hand on it mate. you'll be able to see headlights and street lights and about fark all else on the street.

by the way its useless pricks like you that clog up informative threads with your bullshit. so make like a tree and faaaaaaarrrrrrrrkkkk off :action-smiley-069:

ON TOPIC:

afew months back i did a rego on a V35 and it had 35% front 2 windows and 20% on the rears and 15% on the back. looked sweet i rekon, either though its not legal, either though half the stuff people do to cars these days isnt legal anyway

who is this bender? cos his saying that with 5% of the visible light transmission at night, which means 95% of visible light is blocked out by the tint that he can see clear as day (night), i dont think Troys the one with his hand on it mate. you'll be able to see headlights and street lights and about fark all else on the street.

by the way its useless pricks like you that clog up informative threads with your bullshit. so make like a tree and faaaaaaarrrrrrrrkkkk off :action-smiley-069:

ON TOPIC:

afew months back i did a rego on a V35 and it had 35% front 2 windows and 20% on the rears and 15% on the back. looked sweet i rekon, either though its not legal, either though half the stuff people do to cars these days isnt legal anyway

Clearly your a bit blind either that or you cant read. I said I can see through it well enough. I never made it was the same non tinted windows.

And all of a sudden because I dont have the same opinion as you im a bender?.

I can never understand people that dont agree that have to get abusive as your self to try and make your point

clearly you don't agree that's fine say it and move on.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...