Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'd say as long as there all even, should be fine

Could be the gauge is a little old or somthing, never know really

But they are all even, so I'd give it a thumbs up

if it was 140,138,65,142,70,140 or something like that I'd be starting to worry, but they aren't, so nothing to worry about I reckon

Hi maxim, there are number of factors other than condition of the internals that affect the compression test readings. The most obvious is battery condition, if the engine turns over sowly you will get a lower reading. Did you do it with 5 plugs out and the gauge fitting in the other spark plug hole? That will give a higher reading than 5 plugs in as the engine will turn over slower. Another is cam shaft timing, if you have a set of cams, or adjusted the base timing with adj pulleys, you can get a lower reading as some compression gets out past the open valves.

This is why I prefer a leak down test, much more accurate and repeatable.

Hope that helps

Hi maxim, there are number of factors other than condition of the internals that affect the compression test readings.  The most obvious is battery condition, if the engine turns over  sowly you will get a lower reading.  Did you do it with 5 plugs out and the gauge fitting in the other spark plug hole?  That will give a higher reading than 5 plugs in as the engine will turn over slower.  Another is cam shaft timing, if you have a set of cams, or adjusted the base timing with adj pulleys, you can get a lower reading as some compression gets out past the open valves.

This is why I prefer a leak down test, much more accurate and repeatable.

Hope that helps

Hey Sydneykid, thanks for your input.

A mechanic friend of mine conducted the test while I was not present today. The engine is otherwise stock, with a new battery (Bosch unit) installed only a week ago.

Just one more quick question if thats cool, so far the car (91 180sx with rb25 conversion) has been performing pretty poorly. Only mods are a fmic (flow roughly 400hp size) 3" system from back of dump (dump standard) and ~600hp Bosch intake pump. New plantinum sparks plugs gapped to .8mm were added last week also. The engine also has spitfire coils which came with it.

The best 0-100 v stopwatch (g-tech is coming) is 6.5s which is pretty average from about 10 runs but was consistant. Thats with a variety of launch techniques and I don't think im a shit driver.

The fuel comsumption is terrible. Last top up of 20l lasted around 100km's. My mechanic was trying to determine if the knock sensor was faulty, thus retarding timing and increasing AFR when he found the std computer did not have the LED (?) lights (not 100% sure on this) to read / extract codes from.

Just wondering if you simply name a couple of things to look at next. The car's power delivery seems very linear. I raced a friend in a CA 180sx (his std bar exhaust, std boost) and beat him by only 2 lenghts to ~140 so any help would be great!

Appreciate any comments, thanks.

Hi maxim, I have never seen an RB25DET computer with LED's, they use the dashboard warning light (engine) to display error codes as far as I know. I suggest you get a wiring diagram (I don't have one) and look up the dashboard warning light circuit and install a globe to read the errors. Better still, borrow a Power FC and Commander and read it off the display. A few quick things I would do follow;

1. If the engine revs over 2,500 rpm then it isn't in limp home mode, but it still may pay to do an ECU reset. There are instructions on the forum if you don't know how do this.

2. Check the AFM voltage with a multimeter. Clean the AFM if necessary, there are instructions on the forum if you don't know how do this.

3. What's the boost look like? Have you fitted a boost cut defeater?

4. Check the engine temp sensor.

5. Tried advancing the ignition?

If all else fails stick it on the dyno and do a quick power run (cost $40), have a look at the resulting boost curve and A/F ratios. That should tell the story.

Hope that helps

how is a leak down test done?

A leak down test is like a compression test, except instead of cranking the engine over to get compression, you use a compressed air fed from outside the engine. You connect a pressure gauge and an air feed up to each cylinder (via the spark plug hole), one at a time. Build up pressure and read off how much each cylinder leaks over a fixed period of time. You should get consistent numbers over 90%. There are two types of leak down tests, dry and wet.

I do a "dry" a leak down test first, this tells me if there is any problem. If that cylinder leaks down more than I expect, then I do a "wet" test. With a bit of oil dribbled down the spark plug hole and sealing the rings, I can tell if it is the valves that are causing the leakage. If not then I know it's rings. All good mechanical shops should have a leak down tester, usually a Snap On brand.

This is the inexpensive one I use....

STR-CLT2PB.jpg

Hope that helps

Hi maxim, I have never seen an RB25DET computer with LED's, they use the dashboard warning light (engine) to display error codes as far as I know.  I suggest you get a wiring diagram (I don't have one) and look up the dashboard warning light circuit and install a globe to read the errors.  Better still, borrow a Power FC and Commander and read it off the display.  A few quick things I would do follow;

1. If the engine revs over 2,500 rpm then it isn't in limp home mode, but it still may pay to do an ECU reset.  There are instructions on the forum if you don't know how do this.

2. Check the AFM voltage with a multimeter. Clean the AFM if necessary, there are instructions on the forum if you don't know how do this.

3. What's the boost look like? Have you fitted a boost cut defeater?

4. Check the engine temp sensor.

5. Tried advancing the ignition?

If all else fails stick it on the dyno and do a quick power run (cost $40), have a look at the resulting boost curve and A/F ratios.  That should tell the story.

Hope that helps

Hey Sydneykid,

I'll go through all your suggestions. Appreciate your advice, your a great asset to the forum.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...