Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So on the weekend i was doing some driving (track) at a speed id not done before and had some ass clenching 'feedback'.

Basically i was doing about 170km/h and turned in to a fast left hand curve at 170km/h and while i could feel i would be close to the limits of my mechanical grip i was nonetheless within it. But the car handling feedback i got was not a good one.

Essentially the turn in was perfect (no understeer and it pointed very well and communicatively) but after that the tail end started doing this strange swaying (3 sways: first into oversteer, then under then over) that was a bit too much movement for my likeing at that kind of speed. I had to correct the sways with steering inputs otherwise im sure it would have meant a spin (crash).

A point worth noting is that the tyres were not breaking traction, it was just that the rear end was swaying.

So my question is, what is most likely to have caused this?

The HICAS? the limits of the car and my suspension, tyres etc? old bushes that might need replacing?

as a bit of a run-down i have

An R33 GTS-T

275/35/18 toyo proxes on the rear.

GTR sway bars.

BC coilovers 8/6kg springs (mid damping on the front and lowest on the rear) Car lowered considerably.

HICAS is still on the car...

Other factors-

road surface was very good and grippy- though it was fairly low ambient temp and my tyres werent exactly really warm either.

Anybody familiar with the characteristics of GTST's in this kind of setting and what might have caused this?

cheers

J

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375546-suspension-settings-hicas-or-bushes/
Share on other sites

Understeer, then traction, then oversteer again? Or rear swapping sides?

How quickly did the transformation take? less than 1 second or several seconds?

Wheel to guard heights?

Have you check the rear end for play?

Edited by simpletool

ah interesting, i did not know that about HICAS not operating above 110. That rules that out then (unless there is freeplay in the HICAS mechanism...)

Understeer, then traction, then oversteer again? Or rear swapping sides?

How quickly did the transformation take? less than 1 second or several seconds?

Wheel to guard heights?

Have you check the rear end for play?

transformation was very quick. N it was more the end swapping sides (tho not breaking traction) n it swayed into essentially oversteer first n then swayed the other way, then the other again n then settled drown.

It might have been that i did turn in quite aggressively n it just meant that the rear weight transfer just flicked the back a bit which then took a couple of sways+corrections to settle down.

wheel to guard is about 1-2cm. see attached pic (tho in reality it sits a little lower than this in the rear as it is on the back of a flat top tow in that pic n on the angle with the handbrake on means the rear is sitting about 1-2 cm higher)

I havent had the rear end checked for play recently (did about 9 months ago n all good). Have also had a full 4 wheel alignment about 6 months ago.

Prob will check for freeplay again n get into a suspension shop for a comprehensive look-over.

Can the HICAS systems get freeplay in them or do they lock well when that get above that 110km/h threshold n turn off?

post-68049-0-01451900-1314592150_thumb.jpg

ah interesting, i did not know that about HICAS not operating above 110. That rules that out then (unless there is freeplay in the HICAS mechanism...)

Can the HICAS systems get freeplay in them or do they lock well when that get above that 110km/h threshold n turn off?

My HICAS stuffed up for a while, and I pulled the fuse for it to limp it by for a while. That 'while' turned into about 6 months. After 6-months I got my steering-angle sensor sorted, but the HICAS rack had had been uncontrolled from the fuse being pulled during that time that it had developed excessive free-play in the rack itself. I had to replace the rack with one without play to fix it once and for all. So yes, they can wear, and they can get free-play in the rack itself.

I learnt about the 110kph turn-off in an interesting way. When my HICAS steering sensor was mis-aligned, the car would progressively steer my rear wheels sideways (causing the car to crab) and the steering wheel to 'turn over' to compensate from about 60kph onwards. The first time I got onto the highway and hit 110kph, the car & wheel snapped straight as the HICAS disengaged, nearly caused an accident (which is why I quickly pulled over, and pulled the fuse, as I was driving from Adelaide to Melbourne that day).

I'm not sure how the HICAS system turns off at 110kph - I would assume it would have to lock the rear-tyres in the straight-ahead position. However if the rack has any wear & play in it - obviously this could cause handling issues.

Just f**k it off if your going to track it. Also if your tracking change all the bushes in your suspension. 15 years there gona be pretty average if not completely dead also the control arm ball joints will be gone.

Dont know how serious you are about the car at the track but i would just adjustable arms and do the bushes and get a good grip alignment.

Could be a few things but sounds like play somewhere in the rear end. There is a lot of bushes that need to be replaced. Do them all at once.

You didn't mention if you had pinapples installed (subframe urethane lock). This would be a good first start.

Could be a few things but sounds like play somewhere in the rear end. There is a lot of bushes that need to be replaced. Do them all at once.

You didn't mention if you had pinapples installed (subframe urethane lock). This would be a good first start.

no i dont but the pineapples are the next mod that is going in- just after the camber arms so i can have it all aligned at once after this n will get them to have a look at the bushes just prior to this.

Hey, im still trying to get some more seasoned advice on the pineapple issue. I plan to put in pineapples that help 'grip', particularly in take-off and straight line power-down grip. How truly effective are they at this beyond actually getting the camber just right in the first place?

and, most importantly, are the any compromises that this sort of pineapple introduces?- such as reduced lateral (cornering) grip?

cheers

I'm no expert and it's been awhile but I think the general recommendation is maximum stability - which is FLAT. (neither grip or slip)

Edited by simpletool

yeah right. Cos the reputable garage im speaking to says put in the traction pineapples that tilt the subframe a certain direction which = more grip.

But.

1: usually with anything there is a tradeoff otherwise the factor would have done it like that or everybody would do it aftermarket

2: a garage has the agenda to sell me something and make a profit so its not unbiased...

Pineapples are a good idea. You can put them in 3 ways. 1 enhances longitudinal traction but negatively affects lateral traction, one is neutral and one enhances lateral traction but negatively affects longitudinal grip. If you are worried about losing grip in either direction you just put them in neutral. Regardless of this, they certainly help to lock the subframe up a bit tighter to stop it steering the rear of the car.

Even better is to buy a full set of Whiteline subframe bushes and replace the 15-20 year old ones.

If I were diagnosing your problem I'd suggest that bushes could be worn, HICAS tie rod ends could be worn, subframe bushes could be sloppy, but the HICAS rack itself could be to blame. The electric ones sometimes seem to have some random behaviours. (So do the hydraulic ones - but I know what they do - I have one and I'm getting rid of it, and the entire HICAS subframe).

hmmm, yes well this confirms what i thought... would have to rob from peter to give to paul.

I might just see what putting in the camber arms can do for me.

On that note, does anybody know what is the best camber for the balance between longitudinal traction and lateral traction? At the moment im at 1.2 degrees from memory which is as straight as i can get it at my current ride height on stock R33 camber arms. Iv heard .5 degree is about best...?

As far as all the bushes n freeplay goes im hoping its not to bad. iv never had any symptoms of anything prior to this n this was a pretty extreme setting so for normal to even spirited driving i think everything might still be working well enough.

N its not that i wouldnt want to get it done if it needs but a modified R33 is always crying out in numerous ways for $, time and attention right? :closedeyes:

which means it becomes a priotity list depending on the need at any given time...

n the current top of the list is the camber arms, and fitting the fresh HKS turbo iv got sitting there waiting for action (stock turbo @15psi is screeching real bad) and doing all the exhaust manifold bolts n gaskets.

Cheers again for the thoughts n advice people.

Edited by jjman

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
    • hahah when youtube subscribers are faster than my updates here. Yes some vid from the day is up, here:  Note that as with all track day videos it is boring watching after the bloopers at the start.  The off was a genuine surprise to me, I've literally done a thousand laps around the place and I've never had instability there; basically it rolled into oversteer, slipped, gripped and spat me out. On the way off I mowed down one of the instructor's cones and it sat there all day looking at me with accusing cone eyes as I drove past. 1:13:20 was my fastest lap, and it was in the second session, 3rd lap.  It (or me!) got slower throughout the day as it got hotter.      
×
×
  • Create New...