Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Some have reported good results some havn't.

:D

I've decided to do the mod again since I am running a bit more boost up in the higher rpm's due to my bodgy wastegate mod that reduces the wastegate travel. I'll let you all know if it makes boost in the higher rpms as previously the way the wastegate was setup it would hold boost perfectly.

Theoretically it should creep boost the higher the rpm's go IF the re-circ leak was causing some boost drop. This is only the case with the way I have setup my wastegate hence reduced travel so boost is forced to be made.

I recessed the hole a little so the top of the screw would sit flat. As not to accidentally lift the bov on one side hence leaking out the side of the gasket.

The screw I used was a good ol' short stubby computer case fan screw.

While I was there I checked the piping to see how coated with oil it was.

Suprisingly after 160,000km's (90,000km's of hard 1bar+ boosting, currently 1.1bar 16-17psi) its all pretty clean. Slight bit of oil on the bov its self however the piping is rahter clean. Well compared to 95% of the other R32's I have seen.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/37606-stock-bov-leak-fix-mod-pics/
Share on other sites

I have noticed the following since the mod:

1. Boost is definately much much quieter. Similiar to a car that has a stock airbox.

2. Appears to feel like it has a little more guts down low.

3. Boost appears to be a little lethargic when first starting to make boost - this could be due to not hearing the psssssshhhh as boost comes up.

4. This mod only appears to be of benifit when running 15+ psi.

5. Boost does creep up like I thought.

6. Constantly hits boost cut now :) Time to fiddle again.

7. Changing from first to second when accelerating moderately some times is a little rough.

Think thats it.....

How are the aftermarket re-circ bov's setup? Do they have this recirc bleed type hole?

I don't think they have Joel, well the TurboSmart one that a mate has got hasn't.

I've always wondered if a aftermarket plumb back would give the same feeling as this BOV mod does....

J

It definately does hold boost easier up top now.

I've had to back the boost off so it doesn't boost cut.

I didn't notice any difference at the lower boost levels though (13psi @7000rpm) as it would hold 13psi at 7000rpm easily anyway.

The problem began when I started to try and hold 1bar+ up to 7000rpm.

As I said previously I elongated the wastegate holes in order to reduce the travel of the wastegate hence forcing it to hold boost. So obviously there is a little to be had by stopping the constant re-circ with the stock bov.

Yer the RB20t wastegate is a tougher wastegate (stronger spring).

When I had the VG30BB wastegate on it she would drop boost to around 9-10psi like yours.

The RB20T stocker wastegate with exhaust is 10.9psi. Well mine is anyway. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...