Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Like i said im new to skyline so obviously my knowledge level is low....my mates mechanic can do it for me for no cost just depends how much or what gearbox it is and kms only done 75,000 on the clock so it is a good deal!..:)

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

All skylines odometers are wound back how would a car that's nearly 20years old only have 75000kms

Your mate probably wound it back

And the conversion is still gonna cost close to $2000 for all the parts needed

What do you mean or what gear box, the only option is to put an rb25 gearbox in anything better will be more expensive and anything cheaper won't last as long

Edited by stig mick

Wow what an effort of putting the pic up that shows initiative and FYI im using a smartphone so its quite hard typing down especially with a fat thumb and at work at the same time...sooo childish of yous did not expect to hear that from a 26 years old...ermmm and im new to all these as my profession is in Finance Industry not in mechanics :)

you dont have to be a mechanic to know

1. thats cars ugly

2. auto's are for poofters

3.your getting ripped off

+ 1

christalmighty what an ugly piece of shit. It looks like someone tried to turn it into a prelude...

"Don't build what you can buy" just buy a manual Skyline... and FFS... buy one that hasn't had a "Queer eye for the Leb guy" make over.

The only way the Kms on that car would be genuine, is because no one drives it for fear of being seen in public in that horrific rolling turd.

buy one that hasn't had a "Queer eye for the Leb guy" make over.

The only way the Kms on that car would be genuine, is because no one drives it for fear of being seen in public in that horrific rolling turd.

:rofl2:

180fwkw prelude that weights 1200kg? that would be FAST.

4th gen onwards weighed 1300kg+

R33 GTST is 1390ish so there's not a whole lot in it. The 33 would make mountains more torque too, and being a rear driver wouldn't sit there trying to tie itself in a knot with torque steer.

The 33 would flog it.

And +1 for that car being f**king ugly. All it's missing is lambo doors and you've got yourself a real Lebo Chariot there.

4th gen onwards weighed 1300kg+

is 4th gen the last one?

If so then the car I'm talking about would have close to 1500kg with all the fibreglass, sound equipment and the fully sick 20inches chrome wheels

So it would have handled and accelerated like a truck

Wow what an effort of putting the pic up that shows initiative and FYI im using a smartphone so its quite hard typing down especially with a fat thumb and at work at the same time...sooo childish of yous did not expect to hear that from a 26 years old...ermmm and im new to all these as my profession is in Finance Industry not in mechanics :)

I work in finance, too, but I still know a horrible bag of arse when I see it, and when I look at those pics you posted I'm looking at a horrible bag of arse.

It is a fugly POS. Autos are f**ked. They are fat and slow. The bodykit is an abomination. The stripes look like red gaffa tape. The lights look like someone flogged them off an Audi and glued them on.

It's truly f**king horrible. Anyone who tells you otherwise is either blind, hates you or is a Lebo. Either way, they should not be listened to.

is 4th gen the last one?

If so then the car I'm talking about would have close to 1500kg with all the fibreglass, sound equipment and the fully sick 20inches chrome wheels

So it would have handled and accelerated like a truck

Gen 5 was last and weighed 1380kgs.

The lights look like someone flogged them off an Audi and glued them on.

agreed

Gen 5 was last and weighed 1380kgs.

it just gets worse and worse it was a 5th gen i just googled it

i even found a pic of the actual car i remember the number plate

http://www.flickr.co..._05/5253967954/

e57c1864.JPG

Edited by stig mick

agreed

it just gets worse and worse it was a 5th gen i just googled it

i even found a pic of the actual car i remember the number plate

http://www.flickr.co..._05/5253967954/

e57c1864.JPG

You know what's feking hilarious? That Prelude looks better than the 33 in question.

:rofl2:

That's really saying something.

100% sure, the bugger cant seem to drive manuals lol. Also the other profile just coped a ban, hence new one.

coming to the bbq tomorrow?

i wanna say yes but i am poor beyond a joke

i feel bad turning up with nothing and i cant even afford a 6pack of shit beer

You know what's feking hilarious? That Prelude looks better than the 33 in question.

:rofl2:

That's really saying something.

yeah i'll have to agree but if that was for sale it would be a touch over $7500 even with the 249000kms on the body it currently has

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...