Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Stagea owners,

Doing a bit of birthday and christmas shopping for myself and interested in purchasing a short shifter, I'm aware of the damage they may cause to syncro's due to the fast shift rate.

Currently looking at Nismo's selection of short shifters in the following link http://www.nengun.com/nismo/short-shift wondering as to which short shifter i should be using for my Rsfour S. Have been doing quite a bit of reading and confused as to whether or not my car uses the 34gt-t transmission with the neo motor, or the 33gt-r transmission with the neo motor.

Much appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/383049-nismo-short-shifter-question/
Share on other sites

My Stag has a short shifter.

The only thing I have to compare it to is my R33. I'd prefer a box without it. It's incredibly notchy and if you aren't perfect it shifts like a bastard.

To be honest, assuming the shift would be the same as my 33, I'd prefer it without a short shifter. But I'm not sure it's apples and apples due to what I assume is a hardier box in the Stags to cope with AWD.

Yeah i can understand what your saying, I would have thought the Stagea would have been a better base for a short shifter due to the heavy duty components as opposed to the R33 gtst transmission.

Do you know what transmission the RSfour S uses? gt-r or gt-t...

^^^as above - none of the shifters in the Nengun ad will fit - you need an awd one 32339 - RN595

The Stagea box is the same as GTR which is the same as GTT only plus a transfer case so I guess it will be the same to drive (i.e. incredibly notchy etc).

See the nismo website:

http://www.nismo.co....df/clutch14.pdf

  • 2 weeks later...

i have no issues daily driving with mine

i don't use it to change gears faster, if anything it makes it harder to shift fast because you have less leverage to push against the syncros with

i put a stock shifter in and it was a longer throw than my r31 and felt like a truck! so i went back to the short shifter

it just makes the gearbox feel nice and tight and means you can change gears with a flick of your wrist

Just love the solid feel it gives you when shifting and the shorter throw distance, it makes shifting so much more easier with a nismo equipped short shofter

I assume, based on this thread, you've never driven a Stag with a solid shifter.

Not all cars are the same. Save your cash. By all mean shorten the shift, but don't go for a solid.

And shorter and solid actually making shifting harder as you need to push the level harder due to less leverage and also have to be much more precise due to the solid.

I'm loathe to say they are shit, but it's not far from the truth.

  • 2 weeks later...

^^wtf? solid shifter makes it harder to shift??? pfft. the nismo solid shifter is 7.5mm shorter than standard (faark all) and the solid part is refering to NOT being a 2 piece shaft with a rubber dampener in the guts of it. aka one piece of SOLID metal shifter

the short/quick shifter changes the pivot point so you have LESS leverage and LESS distance for the shifter to travel, hence more force needed to make it shift.

its all about user preference really, some of us dont like burying our hand in the back seat changing into 2nd.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...