Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

p2 Times

01 Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1:37.718 17 laps

02 Mark Webber Red Bull 1:38.475 0.757 36 laps

03 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1:38.483 0.765 35 laps

04 Lewis Hamilton McLaren 1:38.748 1.030 31 laps

05 Jenson Button McLaren 1:38.786 1.068 32 laps

06 Felipe Massa Ferrari 1:39.029 1.311 33 laps

07 Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1:39.448 1.730 32 laps

08 Bruno Senna Williams 1:39.531 1.813 38 laps

09 Kamui Kobayashi Sauber 1:39.653 1.935 36 laps

10 Michael Schumacher Mercedes 1:40.115 2.397 30 laps

11 Kimi Raikkonen Lotus 1:40.166 2.448 32 laps

12 Pastor Maldonado Williams 1:40.230 2.512 35 laps

13 Romain Grosjean Lotus 1:40.286 2.568 32 laps

14 Sergio Perez Sauber 1:40.326 2.608 35 laps

15 Daniel Ricciardo Toro Rosso 1:40.435 2.717 30 laps

16 Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso 1:40.516 2.798 32 laps

17 Nico Hulkenberg Force India 1:40.700 2.982 34 laps

18 Paul di Resta Force India 1:41.430 3.712 35 laps

19 Heikki Kovalainen Caterham 1:42.476 4.758 38 laps

20 Timo Glock Marussia 1:42.652 4.934 33 laps

21 Vitaly Petrov Caterham 1:42.846 5.128 38 laps

22 Charles Pic Marussia 1:43.538 5.820 38 laps

23 Pedro de la Rosa HRT 1:44.453 6.735 16 laps

24 Narain Karthikeyan HRT 1:45.114 7.396 20 laps

http://www.planetf1.com/driver/3213/8253198/Prac-Two-Two-from-two-for-Vettel

  • Replies 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

the old aero packages generated too much downforce, and the FIA periodically has to fiddle with the allowable wing dimensions to keep cornering speeds reasonable

*waits for some retard to say driver and spectator deaths are a perfectly acceptable trade off for 'spectacle'*

yer coz tyres that delaminate is so much more ''safer''................. :rolleyes:

yer coz tyres that delaminate is so much more ''safer''................. :rolleyes:

Having tyres that delaminate is safer than having higher speeds. One is only a drama at the end of the tyres life, the other means that if something goes wrong at a higher speed, there is more chance of injury or death.

Ferrari pushing the rules to the limit and deliberately getting Massa a grid penalty to move Alonso up another spot. Clever, but if it was Red Bull doing that everyone would be spitting chips calling them cheats

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • f**king around with the bro
    • Ludenham   44.2 tops day no issues  
    • Then today, I went to visit a man with an r33 hat Peter and Road and Race sorted the alignment. As it is being set up for general track/hillclimbs etc it has a heap of caster (7o), less camber than I am used to (1o front and 2o rear, as the caster looks after that in turns without the braking downsides), 3mm front toe out and 0 toe rear. Will see how that goes and track tyre wear to see if it does need more camber, but adjsustment is also limited with nismo arms and adjustable bushes at only 1 end. It does have a bent inner tie rod on the driver's side front but as it came up within spec I'll just leave that as is. So, that is getting close to my chapter of this story....could of tidy ups then a shakedown in early October before it finds a new home.
    • So, it went to Unigroup for a run in and tune on Friday, everything went (generally) well. In terms of fixes, the engine was good and there were no leaks. It needed plugs (I hadn't checked them because the coil pack cover was on a new engine and I couldn't imagine they weren't new.....but turns out the temporary plugs to just keep it sealed up were in there.....new plugs gapped to 0.8 and it was fine from there. Also, there was a little preload on the clutch slave which caused some slip. I haven't had the box off so I don't know what the clutch looks like; my guess it is brand new and the pedal had not been adjusted....backed that off a bit and it held fine. Last thing will have Dose crying....the idle especially when cold is a bit difficult between the cams, forward plenum, atmo blow off valve and an 80s air management system. It is fine when hot but a little uneven when cold, will see if I can sort or at least improve that one cold morning. Other than that, tuning went fine. It made 245 but was pulled back to 227 which 2 opportunities to improve in future. 1. The factory CAS is not great and was jumping around at high RPM, so Mark took 2 degrees out up top (that is why it stops making power and lost 20kw). Very safe this way and the extra power is available but will require a more modern ECU and better cam (or even better crank) sensor 2. The 2871 in factory housings is very big for a low mount, and the internal wastegate is too small, so it was creeping from mid range all the way to redline....the duty cycle on the boost controller is turned down a little for safety. That is much harder to fix, it would need a large external gate and that would require a whole bunch of other changes, so it will go as it is for now. It feels nice and healthy and safe, so should be good for about a billion laps like this.
    • what sort of caliper are they? If they are a slider and you gave everything a good clean, you might need to regrease the pins. My guess though is they will come good after some abuse as suggested above
×
×
  • Create New...