Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

But to re-iterate that thread, given the Neo has RB26 rods and N1 oil pump, solid lifters, plus longer inlet manifold runners (for better midrange torque) and VTC, it makes it better in many ways than the RB26 and the missing 100cc hardly matters.

26 still sounds better though.

Edited by GTSBoy

Yes the Neo does have a lot going for it, but still I think I would choose the RB26 due to the ITB's. It does sound better too.

After market parts support is better for the RB26 too when compared to the Neo version of the RB25.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/348495-gtr-head-info/

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/335429-gtr-front-facing-plenum-on-rb25-neo-intake/

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/122479-neo-head-vs-rb26-head/

Just some of the many threads I found in a 5 second use of the search.

Please try using it first in future. Many topics are covered in depth, do the users justice who post in them - and read.

Cheers.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So for the wide band is a Bosch 4.9 correct for the Link G4+ along with a Can bus? Just get the Link gear or is generic ok too? Eg here: LINK LINK DIGITAL WIDEBAND CAN MODULE WITH BOSCH 4.9 SENSOR : KYP Performance House  
    • Bit difficult to follow. Have a look below and see what the standard R32 layout was like. Note there was a restrictor in place immediately before "turbocharged pressure control solenoid" that, if removed, magically got you 1 bar boost.
    • I might be way off the mark here.. there must be a T junction under the manifold. That takes manifold pressure through a check valve prior to the T, one side splits out to this bleed off orifice, the other straight to the wastegate actuators. 
    • Carrying out some engine due diligence before my first drive in a 260RS that has been in storage for 10+ years, and found two lines that are susposed to be plumbed into the boost control solenoid. One of the lines (the wastegate boost supply line) to actuate the gates, had a bolt in one end blocking it. The other line (main boost signal line) from the very rear of the intake manifold (RB26DETT) and runs up to the boost controller had this pill in the end of it as seen in photos. Other than the obvious (T28 Ceramic turbos might well be cooked)  Can anyone shed any light on if there is any validity at all with this mod, bleeding a constant fixed rate of manifold boost pressure off through this 3mm hole?  Is it deliberate?  Was this a 90s Jap mod done to RB26's? Or has someone just fitted this without any idea of what happens to ceramic T28s if they are not gate controlled?    
×
×
  • Create New...