Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

opened the bonnet the other day when doing my 3000km oil change to see my coolant reservoir was bloody low. Decided to drop the coolant and put fresh in, not sure if it has been because of the hot weather of late or

because of the coolant but water temps were a little hotter of late: 2-4 degrees... all went well, ran all the air out, job done.

Open up my garage today to see a huge pool of coolant under my car.... got under there and nothing from around the turbo, checked everywhere etc/... post-36975-0-40913600-1325486159_thumb.jpg

Couldn't see anything from the water pump because it had the cover over it, anyway found this little pool drippinglower down from around under the water pump area, so I am quite sure it has gone.. post-36975-0-64201400-1325486152_thumb.jpg

questions - 1. Will an N1 water pump fit my rb25de block or just go the standard rb25 pump?

2. If an N1 pump will fit, based on my power, and the fact that with the slightly higher compression my motor can suffer badly from heat soak, is an n1 water pump worth it or is it not even noticeable?

bloody annoying as I got my mechanic to do my timing belt (do most stuff myself but don't want to screw something like that up) 10,000kms ago as I was coming up to 200,000km, I am 400km off 200K and it has gone :@

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/387039-water-pump-replacement-rb25det/
Share on other sites

ahh cool, car is 100% street, in future would like to occasionally get it on the track. good to know the difference, thanks.

I was just wondering if the n1 pumps more water around or something along those lines to help stationary heat

n1 are just fine on the street,get a nismo thermostat as well if you can,my street driving temp in summer is never more than 78 deg even on a real hot day winter sits around 68-70 deg.

in the end get what you can afford or plan for your future mods.my 5c as

no and no

a n1 pump might work fine for most people but unless its a dedicated track car its a step backwards, a standard pump will work better in a street car, even one that sees track work.

those low temp thermostats would have to be the worst thing nismo has ever made, again a standard thermostat works much better all round, even for track cars. the standard ecu and 90% of aftermarket ecu's dont get out of cold enrichment until 80 deg, so having a low temp thermostat simply keeps you in cold enrichment longer and sometimes forever (winter nights) without actually helping to stop overheating at all. if your car overheats with a standard thermostat (provided its working of course) its still gonna overheat with a nismo thermostat.

Edited by JonnoHR31

^^^what he said. N1 pump is made to cope with high revs so not so good for normal use. Most journeys are less than 10km so an early opening thermostat just means it takes longer to get to proper operating temperature (or often never does so oil beomes more diluted). And once the thermostat is open it makes no difference to the cooling ability on a hot day or on the track.

Cheers guys,

Price was not really the issue, was the question of what will be more suitable.

I have looked on Kudos, there is also frsport but they are american so long time deliveries... but the thing that has put me off them is the postage... http://www.frsport.c...B26_p_9422.html

I don't remember it ever being that bad from frsport previously, but $211 for 2-3 days or $140 for 2-5 days to my door is ridiculas, the part is only listed on there for $100, so I will by from somewhere in aus like kudos.

Next thing is installing it - I do work on the car myself a fair bit, but I am not confident with removing the timing belt and lining everything up perfectly, so will take it to one of my trusted workshops, it is about 10 mins drive but based on the fact that I am losing > 1 litre a day without the motor running I don't think I want to turn it on again, thinking tow truck....

make sure that the coolant that came out is overflow, because my resorvoir is never that full if any and my temp is always half way at the right temp. and there is water in my radiator. just to double check you might be spending money for nothin. unless temp is too high once its hot then its pump.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...