Jump to content
SAU Community

Drag Racing Your R35: All You Need To Know About Andra


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It would be truly hilarious to turn up to Wicked Wednesday in a bog stock Bugatti Veyron and be told not to come back until attending to the following;

4.11.6 Parachutes

Cars exceeding 140 MPH must be fitted with drag racing parachute.

4.12 Interior

4.12.1 Upholstery/Seats

Purpose built race seat is required for cars quicker than 10.00

4.12.2 Window Nets

Cars quicker than 11.00 require window nets UNLESS arm restraints are used instead.

4.14 Roll Bars & Safety Cages

4.14.6 Full 6 point roll cage with removable support members

Unmodified cars ET 8.00 - 9.99: full cage mounted at six points with removable side intrusion bars

4.17 Technical Inspections

Cars quicker than 11.00 require Tech Inspections carried out prior to issuing (or renewal of) Log Books. you must get "Teched" every two years. Evidence of Tech Inspection is by chassis sticker on the vehicle (on the roll bar).

4.19 Driver Safety

4.19.1 Arm Restraints

Cars quicker than 11.00 require arm restraints to prevent arms from extending outside confines of roll cage.

4.19.5 Head Protector

Cars with a roll cage rehire a padded head protector at bcd of driver's helmet.

4.19.9 safety Belts/ Harnesses

Cars faster than 130 MPH: 5 point harness

I will at least give credit to SD, WB and PM for their intention to bring drag racing a step forward.

Aaron, I take it that WB and PM have adopted these new regs for street meets? Any chance that SD can renegotiate that particular part of the lease? How long is the lease for? :D

They have, and for every person who is overjoyed, there are some who have the shits with it.

The problem is, you have to accomodate for the lowest common denominator. Having rules based on individual cars is just way to much f'ing around.

Charlie, I'm not sure when the lease is up for re-negotiation.

The thing is though, SD & ANDRA have bigger things to worry about atm, than just late model cars that can run 10's with minor mods.

SD is in a bad way (financially) and if you think that the ANDRA fee's are over the top, you should see the rent that has to be paid & the cost to hire the ambulance etc.

Do you know if the other ANDRA drag tracks are in the same financial situation?

The situation regarding modern cars remains though, I've been speaking with other clubs about filling spots for an upcoming SAUNSW private rental day at SD (as has the rest of the SAUNSW execs) and other club officials and members are happy to go ahead and get involved but as soon as the price and more importantly the rules are mentioned they all pull out. Maybe we are not well connected enough to other clubs who are more focused on drag racing? Although that highlights the point about the sports accessibility needing to be looked at.

It would be interesting to see how many bookings SD have for weekends and weeknights (other than the regular off street meets).

I agree. It was a struggle to fill the minimum spots for the last SAU:NSW Drag Day. This wasn't be helped by the lack of accessibility and relative cost, coupled with the fact that there were limitations and additional costs if you went quicker than 12.00 (SS licence), and you would be booted if you went quicker than 11.00.

Comparatively, people would prefer to go across the road to EC and race around all day instead of SD at similar costs.

SD needs to look at its current set up (particularly toward entry level racing) if it hopes to allow the sport to grow, and in turn increasing its bottom line. For eg, if they allowed 100 cars at private days @ $100 each, it would be more attractive to street cars (particularly when Wednesday night street meets are always at capacity).

The idea of allowing modern cars to go quicker without the need to have additional safety gear is a step in the right direction. Unfortunately, their hands are tied by the government. So back to square one there...

Looks like drag racing in NSW can only go round and round in circles...

For eg, if they allowed 100 cars at private days @ $100 each, it would be more attractive to street cars (particularly when Wednesday night street meets are always at capacity).

Surely this 40 minimum cars at $200 and 50 maximum wouldn't be in their lease right?

If so, and we, as the club, were offered that deal, we would be able to go ahead with private rental days. But as it stands now, we're likely to get around 18-20 entrants and the hire agreement means the hirer (eg SAUNSW the club) has to pay for the unused spots being around 20-22 at $200 ea ($4000-4200) which of course is not acceptable.

Hopefully SD can listen to feedback and adjust their packages to suit.

  • 4 weeks later...

SD is a Govt owned facility & the lease with the Govt states that ALL events must be run under full ANDRA sanction.

Real pity that.

I wonder how the Motorplex in Perth are going with their New Regulations for 2012

Modern Street Cars Originally fitted with four Wheel Disc Brakes & Air Bags

10.00 – 10.49

Original 3 point lap sash As manufactured

Approved Full face Helmet – AS 1698 min

Long Sleeve, Long Pants clothing & closed shoes

You could take your R35 out there and run a 10.01 pass day in, day out.

Much more realistic. Does anyone know if the Plex is ANDRA sanctioned for Street Meets? Guessing not, otherwise it's one rule for one mob, and another rule for the next.

It has nothing to do with "one rule for one mob, and another rule for the next". As stated earlier, the SD lease specifically states that all events must be run under Andra sanction, wheres the 'Plex and WB don't have such terms, and hence are able to run different street meet rules.

I am sure that the other tracks around Aus can also do this (Calder, Heathcote etc)

wheres the 'Plex and WB don't have such terms, and hence are able to run different street meet rules.

Well hence my question...

Does anyone know if the Plex is ANDRA sanctioned for Street Meets?

Ash,

PM and WB are ANDRA sanctioned tracks (for all events), however, they have negotiated public liability cover that will allow them to run minor events such as street meets under separate (or modified) rules to ANDRA. SD cannot do this due to their lease. Has nothing to do with ANDRA.

ANDRA won't sanction it, it has everything to do with it - according to earlier posts at least anyway.

Was just posting more info I came across that was interesting to this whole debate etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...