Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys,

I've been on the hunt for quite some time for a decent yet affordable multi function display unit (much like the greddy infometer touch without the $600+ $300 (for sensors) price tag) - my main important displays would be oil temp & oil pressure in the display/gauge.

I've come across this unit on ebay. http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/CAR-VEHICLE-LCD-GAUGE-OIL-PRESSURE-TEMPERATURE-RPM-VOLT-multifunction-4-1-/200689764810?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item2eba0ac9ca

seems like a handy little unit and judging by the pictures, it looks to be made by Autogauge (according to the logo) but searching on the autogauge website, i can't find anything.

has anyone had any experience with this or can recommend any other multi displays (as long as it has oil temp & pressure together) units for under $300?

size: 14.5cm X 8cm X 2cm (thinking of squeeze this in my spare din slot)

comes with:

1x display unit

1x mounting bracket

1x oil temp sensor

1x oil pressure sensor

1x control box

displayrv.jpg

The seller offers 3 months warranty against factory defects, and i've asked him if there has been any reported issues and his reply was

"The only issue people have is with the RPM indication is not as instantaneous as a normal rev counter, as it is a digital readout"

for $117 + $10 delivery, and being shipped from QLD, seems like a very good buy!

thoughts/comments ??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/394229-4-in-1-multi-function-display/
Share on other sites

how does it connect ?

sensors go to a control box, and the control box plugs into the unit.

I'm personally using the ARK MFD which works very very well. Unfortunately it costs a bit more than this one and does require additional sensors for the oil temp/pressure.

Yeah, i saw that unit, looks nice but cost wise kills it.

i might just stick with my blitz gauges and run them.

did some more searching, and came across this in the UK; http://www.zada-tech.com/product/multi-gauges/lcd-based-digital-multi-gauge

still quite expensive but cheaper then ARK and Greddy units.

too bad it isn't boxed and looks very ghetto/DIY.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...