Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

.82 is too small small for a VL, yet for a 260z! :D

last 2 VLs i have put GT35/40s on with .82, ended up changing to a 1.06 with 1 month of road driving.

.82 are fun, but boost comes on too hard to quick. (again this comes down to the application of the car, .82 would be good for circuit work.)

I'm going with a gt3040 on the rb30det

The car weighs 1200kgs and I am unsure if I should go 1.06 or .82?

The engine wont be reving past 7000rpm and aiming for 500hp at the fly.

Using a turbo that generates extra power past 7000rpm for this motor would be useless.

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

if boost response is a priority use a GT30R with the larger 1.06 exhaust housing and a large external gate.

Hi DP33, it's great to have a turbo educated person on the forum, please hang around, lots. Can you please explain the above? I would have thought a .82 would have been more responsive. I have found engines with "excessively" large wastegates to be very poor controllers of boost ie; lots of fluctuations. Whereas engines with "correctly" sized wastegates have good boost control. My experience has been that "correctly" sized is a bit smaller than is usually recommended.

If I can ask one more question, what are your thoughts on the Turbonetics T66 compressor as far as "up to date technology" goes?

So what exactly is my turbo??

AR .70 Intake

AR .82 Exhaust

The center core has Japan Allied Signal. 700177-17 CK0103J

GTR-Ben,

this core number is not listed as a standard Garrett core.

It must a variant from HKS.

does the plate say anything else on it apart from the CHRA Part No.?

Revive the dead thread :D

I was pretty much sold on the idea of the gt3040 but the seller of the internally gated gt3540 has come back to me and now I am tempted again.

Is it really too big?

What would be the effect?

Bear in mind that it will be cheaper than the GT3040 which seems to be mid to high $2000's plus supplying your own rb25det exhaust housing?

3540 internally gated, u will never be able to control boost with a internal gate on that turbo.

Why is that?

at around 15psi I thought it still may be up to the task?

Maybe you think that this power level will only keep me happy for a short time before i get silly with the boost? I am sure this will not happen due to a few thoughts of mine:

My 3L engine is not built with stronger internals, don't want to break anything.

I never plan to run 20psi+ for power runs etc, numbers are not my interest.

i have fully seam welded the car, but short of a full cage, the paper thin chassis will have trouble with too much torque across it.

250 at the rears will be plenty.

To testify to the power delivery I want, i almost bought a VH45 before this motor was built.

Anyways, I appreciate the input and if you can clarify to me why you think this it would be great

Thanks

the internal gate is so small it cant bybass enough exhaust gas to control boost properly and creates 2 much back pressure in the exhaust system. Internal gated turbo are good for little T28's.

It doesnt look THAT small :aroused:

You answer your own question.

"250 at the rears will be plenty' at this sort of power a GT30 will be fine - a gt35 will be a bit of overkill, unecessary lag. The bigger the compressor, the later you should be making boost or else you will get surge.

If you want to go a GT35 internal gate, make sure you run a decent AR ratio on the turbine, otherwise the internal gate will have to do too much work. If you can imagine that wastegates are like taps - the more flow you need the bigger the tap should be (garden tap v's fire hydrant). If the turbine AR is too small, it will not be able to pass enough gas to hold lower boost pressures, resulting in boost spikes. Also, the larger the AR, the greater the lag - its always a compromise somewhere.

Thanks,

I understand, I guess I am just looking to take advantage of a bargain.

the big online suppliers all do an internal gated GT30 or GT3040, I think on an exchange basis with the stock turbo to use the exhaust housing. These are over $2k plus the exchange turbo which I dont have, but they seem like the way to go for this application.

If u had the choice, (to anyone out there), Out of a GT35/40R (Part number 714568-0001) and the HKS 3037s (both with 0.8 housings) which would u choose?

Money is no problem, and all support sysytems are taken care of. I have the choice of both of these, but dont know which to choose....I am leaning towards the HKS 3037s though.

Going on an RB31DET (same as Joel's:))

The wastegate is just the little flap on the right, so yes it is small

I understand what it is, but i was referring to its size respective to the CD on the left. Considering popular external gates start at around 38mm, it doesnt look that far off.

If u had the choice, (to anyone out there), Out of a GT35/40R (Part number 714568-0001) and the HKS 3037s (both with 0.8 housings) which would u choose?

Money is no problem, and all support sysytems are taken care of. I have the choice of both of these, but dont know which to choose....I am leaning towards the HKS 3037s though.

Going on an RB31DET (same as Joel's:))

Garrett GT35R

but i am biased

Guest INASNT
I understand what it is, but i was referring to its size respective to the CD on the left. Considering popular external gates start at around 38mm, it doesnt look that far off.

Any performance shop u talk to will always tell u to go external gate with such a big turbo. Coz in the long run u r better off

to all,

fwiw, the BA XR6 turbo doesn't have any problems producing 250+ rwkw with an internally gated Garrett GT35.

if it's lower boost you're looking at running, i think it should do fine.

Bl4ck32,

what's your power target? this should help u make your decision.

the HKS 30307S (A/R .87) will help you make up to 330-340rwkw on anywhere up to 25psi, but the Garrett GT35R will allow u to make closer to 380rwkw with the same boost, although bare in mind, the garrett GT35R has larger wheels so the response would be worse when compared to the HKS GT3037S.

but then again, it all depends on how much power u want, and how u want it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...