Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, looking to get my v35 lowered. I don't have much cash so want to go the cheapest possible route - so basically looking at getting springs. I don't want anything too outrageous perhaps 1-1.5" drop, something that wont affect my shocks too much. Anyway have good experience with any particular springs? There is a place in Adelaide, they want to charge ~530 to lower my car with king springs, however its a 40-50mm drop, is this too much? I have 19"s so just want the car to sit a little lower and have the wheels nice and flush with the guards. Any help will be appreciated

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/396902-lowering-the-v35/
Share on other sites

40-50mm is way too much if you drive in Adelaide - that is about how much I am lowered and I hate it - I am going to raise mine up again as my aftermarket front bar and exhaust components both scrape on everything. If your car is stock you might be ok though.

Also keep in mind that if you drop it that much you will definitely need rear camber arms, as there is not much camber adjustment in the rear of the V35s.

You are on the right track with finding some 350Z springs IMHO - I am on the hunt for some as well.

Did you know we have a Skyline club in Adelaide? www.sausa.com.au

Cheers mate, yeah after reading around a little I have decided I don't want to drop it any lower than 1" which I think will work out fine.

I just don't know where to get a nice set of springs from :S and then I need to find a good place to install. I reckon installation will end up being around the 200 mark.

And yeah heard about sasau from Brad!

just my thoughts..if you dont have much cash to spend-keep the car standard and enjoy, use the money on keeping the car running well.

from my experience,if you are going to do something, do it properly.

if you really want to go down that path, i have had good experience with Magill Bridgestone and North Terrace Tyres, also Sinergy have a lot of experience with V35s and suspension installs.

Yeah I'm getting a service done at the same time - thinking I'll go with sinergy. Will get them to install 1" lower springs along with doing a service.

PS. on another note - I tried to remove my gear knob tonight as its worn and was thinking of reconditioning it - have worked on many cars in the past and removing the knobs is as simple as twisting. Now tried this on the v35 tried to twist a little, did half a rotation then stopped and googled it only to find out there is a proper way of doing it, and if done incorrectly you can damage your transmission!!!!! Is there a chance I damaged my transmission? I had the car turned off and put it through the gears after and it seemed fine.. Guess I get really paranoid with these things :S I'll do it properly with a clamp tomorrow, just hope by I didn't fk up anything :(

Edit: just took her for a drive and she seems fine! pheww

Cheers

Edited by itpesaf

Now there are so many V35 owners in SA on here we should get another SA V35 meet organised! Last one we had about 8 V35s from memory.

Lets organise one!! once we get our new lights they are going to look amazing and a million bucks!!

I'd be very keen

  • 2 weeks later...

Quick question in regard to lowering a Sedan, g35driver recommends using 350z springs on the front and coupe springs on the rear, this apparently gives a simlar gap between the guard and the tyre and makes it look even, also they have the same spring rate as the factory sedan springs so the ride won't be harsh. Are there any sedan owners on here who have gone down this track? or are the spring heights different for JDM coupes, and/or Aust Delivered 350Z?

^^ I think that is the idea of the coupe springs in the rear. The 350Z springs give a level drop in reference to the road, but looks uneven due to the different wheel arch gap, and since I have staggered tyres, I might go down the z/coupe combo route if I can ever find springs for a reasonable price.

if you want 350z springs, a guy posted this on the Z forum a month ago

------------

Following parts are for sale, they are of my 03' zed track and only travelled 63k's.

1) Tailights - perfect condition

2) Factory CB exhaust and Cats, few scratches but overall in good shape

3) Factory Air Box, filter and Pipe, can sell separate or as a kit

4) Crankshaft sensor and passenger side Camshaft sensor

5) Factory antenna

4) Factory 18' track rims with bridgestone potenzas

5) Factory springs and shocks

Parts are in Sydney, pm or call me on 0410 645 213 if your interested in any or all of these quality used OEM parts. Happy to send pics via email.

Thanks guys...

Nico

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...