Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 1 year later...

ok not sure if nobody actually has feedback but just got this month's newsletter and one thing:

there is no point of contact (or did i miss it?) mentioned in the email? "let us know" and "feel free to contact us" has no meaning if we have no idea WHO to contact! of course, correct me if i'm wrong.

secondly i saw that you had social network submitter, i would be interested to help out with that since i'm at a pc and fairly able to post on twitter/fb most of the time.

Hmmm 13 "spam complaints" from the newsletter... Seems people do not realise there is an "unsubscribe" at the bottom.

Please don't mark them as spam, unsubscribe! :/

Gotta be careful with that one Ash or the Newsletter will get shutdown! I had the same issue when i initially did our work one and had to manually go and delete every bad address one by one! Took me over a week to sort it out!

The Spam Complaints go to an online body and they can cause you some grief!

Nah it can't be used in that fashion as we are not emailing from SAU servers, we are using Mandrill.

So it will simply not send it to them next time and over time it'll refine down, no major issue other than people just being lazy... Or someone still upset over getting a warning or something :)

Plus it works on averages IIRC, 65,000 emails / 13 "spam" - won't alter our rating in the slightest with Mandrill :thumbsup:

Hey guys,

Thanks for the feedback, will definitely add contact details in future. Funnily, we sent *so* many tests to a select few people and we changed and tweaked and adjusted and there were still things we forgot! haha.

Live and learn. :D

  • PranK unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...