Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just played for 3 hours.

Umm, so far very easy (0-10). We were waiting for the boss, hoping it would be harder, it was and good fun.

I'm level 12 now and the monsters are getting harder to kill and deal a lot more damage.

It is very simple, the skills are set up for you and you just unlock them as you level up.

I didn't really follow the hype, so I didn't have expectations. Not really a gamer either, this is the first computer game I've purchased since, CS 1.3 or 1.5 or something haha.

I personally think it is different to Diablo 2 though.

Yeah it's pretty fun. I don't like having to log in every time but I guess them's the breaks.

Also a little surprised at how demanding it seems to be considering the graphics aren't super-amazing. I mean there's fantastic use of colour and effects but the models aren't very detailed.

Even with a 2500K + 6950 i notice occasional stuttering with max settings.

That'll be more driver related than anything as Blizzard games are generally not well refined in the code department for the level of detail you get.

SC2 was exactly like that. You'll probably find it's more server related than the game itself

Cheers for the guest pass :cheers: im waiting for my copy from ozgameshop so I can at least play something while I wait.

managed to play for 20 mins before battlenet went offline for updates, the graphics don't run that smooth on my PC at this stage but as someone mentioned give it a week or two and driver updates should fix that.

I really like the load times and the game feels very stable. It doesn't feel like the games going to shit itself like BF3. Only took 20 mins to get to lvl 3 and its was very easy so far.

I'll try it again tonight.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...