Jump to content
SAU Community

  

21 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

GT Liberty or F6 would be my top two.

X5s are big, heavy buckets of shit. They are known for chewing through brakes, transmissions and turbos. That's aside from typical Bavarian electrical issues. Go find a general tow-truck driver and ask him which brand he tows most regularly and it'll be BMW closely followed by Mercedes. I wouldn't touch a Jeep with a 100' pole. Aust Delivered ones are assembled in Austria using American made parts. While better than the original full US built ones, I still wouldn't touch anything with so much US content.

On top of that I figure if you have near $50k to spend, you want something fairly new, if not brand spankers. $50k is going to put her into a 5 year old X5. That's too old IMO. I'd want something no more than two years old for that kinda money.

$45k gets you a practically brand new GT Liberty - http://www.carsales.com.au/demo/details/subaru-liberty-2011-11844003?base=1216&vertical=Car&cr=0&eapi=2&__N=1246%201247%201252%201282%204294963801%204294963605%201216%204294739407&silo=Stock&Range=Price:40000,50000~0.5&sort=Price

And finally when time comes to sell it, she'll actually get something for a Liberty or F6 or 370 or Ralliart Lancer. You want to throw money away? Buy a BMW. My owns a 1999 BMW 750iL (5.4L V12). It is in immaculate condition and has less than 170,000ks on it. You want to know what he paid for it? $16,000 in 2009. You want to know what it was worth brand new? $286,000. That's $270,000 in 10 years. $27,000 a year. Ouch!

IMO BMWs are for either enthusiasts (they are great performing cars) or someone who turns over their car every other year. If you're looking for a car which you'll have for 5+ years there's no friggin' way I'd recommend a BMW.

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Shocked to hear a falcon of any spec will not depreciate like crazy, I know the beemers and other euro marks drop very quickly after a few years hence looking at one where most of he damage is already done.

I didn't realize the x5 was so unreliable and will take that into account. Ie probably avoid them.

Getting a few votes for the M3 in here, surely they are a little more reliable? Cherokee is probably out, she is leaning more towards a TT than a 370z but surely that would be a mistake?

All BMWs depreciate.

M BMWs depreciate FAR less and hold their value pretty damn well. E39s have been around 50k for a low km example for the past 5 years or so.

I never had ANY problems with my 98 E36 M3 Evo nor my 1999 E39 540i but both were bought from enthusiasts who cared for them.

Shocked to hear a falcon of any spec will not depreciate like crazy, I know the beemers and other euro marks drop very quickly after a few years hence looking at one where most of he damage is already done.

I didn't realize the x5 was so unreliable and will take that into account. Ie probably avoid them.

Getting a few votes for the M3 in here, surely they are a little more reliable? Cherokee is probably out, she is leaning more towards a TT than a 370z but surely that would be a mistake?

M3s are great cars, but personally unless it was a weekend special or I was particularly handy with the tools, I also wouldn't buy one. They are highly strung and expensive to maintain when you don't do some or all of it yourself.

I would have a 370 over the TT because, well, the TT looks as gay as two rainbow coloured male unicorns open mouth kissing. I'd also hazard a guess that the 370 is faster, more comfy and more practical and holy SHIT! have you heard one with a rorty exhaust? Wow!

I would have a 370 over the TT because, well, the TT looks as gay as two rainbow coloured male unicorns open mouth kissing.

LOL thats sigworthy

:cheers:

reading up on them on Z and Audi forums and only the quattro TT S really compares to the Z performance wise which is of course out of our price range. Newest affordable TT is a low spec 07' model and your right, as gay as..

as for the M's she is nervous about the servicing costs as well, will just have to test drive an E46 and see how it feels in comparison to the Z and if its worth putting up with the age and subsequent monies needed poured into it..

also on the list

75905d1189907485-platinum-graphite-g37-pictures-g37-driver-side-frt.jpg

not a track car obviously though one was lapping wakefield last time i was out there.

Do it, drive the datsun then drive the M3 and try pick the datsun ;)

Dollar for dollar I reckon the Datto will better the M.

EDIT: And again, have you heard a Z with an exhaust? Wow! Brilliant sound, one of the best I've heard.

Edited by Cowboy1600

dont think i have Aaron but i sure will be looking for one already modified, unfortunately the only one so far thats done anything to his Z made the rear end look like this..

524940_115631058574644_100003832519363_88224_1211967408_n.jpg

ugh

Yes I've heard em and I think they sound god-awful lol. V6 hater here (<3 NSX).

Heard an M3 with an exhaust? :woot:

Yes, M3s sound great, but again, you can have a 10 year 100,000k old M3 or 2 year 10,000k old Zed. I'll have the Zed thanks.

thanks warps, great post!

the hot hatches would be too small which helps narrow it down somewhat, rex, M3/5 and 370 are definitely on the short list though. Im not sure how much fun the M5 would be around wakefield but im sure it would be amazing on the road.

To be honest i didnt think of anything as new as the FT86, love the idea of getting something a few years old and saving a bundle on depreciation but the 86 would be pretty tempting and probably hold their value for a while..will definitely have a look at them.

lol at lexus verdict, she drives a Camry now so another version with a shinier badge? no fanx

Nissan V37 3.5 or 3.7 sedan or Lexus IS 350, nothing like a Camry.

The back is a bit gawdy, but the rest looks the shizz.

http://www.carsales....ice:Min,Max~0.5

lol at the reason he gives for selling the Z...dude is buying an M3, safe to assume its the six figure E90 but lol

So at first i was horrified by the rear end but having checked my own hard drive for 370Z pics.

522962_114689038668846_1430826719_n.jpg

577122_114690842001999_1861651747_n.jpg

not-bad-obama.png

shes now asking how much it would cost to make it that colour purple :P

Nissan V37 3.5 or 3.7 sedan or Lexus IS 350, nothing like a Camry.

yeah for some reason she is not warming to the lexus, i hired one in Melbourne last year, just the IS250 but still, about as involving as catching an elevator..cant imagine the slightly bigger engined one is much better.

V37 will be test driven.

cant help but wonder if its worth flying down to melbourne to take this for a spin..

http://www.carpoint.com.au/all-cars/private/details.aspx?R=12597553&__Qpb=1&Cr=11&__Ns=pCar_PriceSort_Decimal

dont you love people who tell you how much power the car COULD have if you bought the right mods for it? Why not just mod the bloody thing properly and then tell us how much it HAS.

still 317KW for a 7yr old Rex aint bad..and it IS the right colour!

yeah I almost feel sorry for them and their 'family tragedy' thats forcing them to sell it at such a 'low' price ;)

Still i love seeing a car thats already had the hard work done for me (ok her but you know what i mean)

will def post whats bought though it could be a week or two

so you dont like its looks (i used to but oddly i have moved away from that stance..especially since i keep spotting gay unicorns making out in them) but they are reliable.

how is it dynamically? would you ever track it?

TT's are pretty much off the list anyway, only a new RS would be any good and not enough monies for those.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...