Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You're thinking into this too much Ruxis.

SAU can be held liable when they organise a cruise because they are the organisation in charge of the forum.

The fact is, a user on a car forum won't be held liable for organising an unofficial cruise simply because there is no proof that it was you exactly who posted the car meet.

Whilst it might have come from your IP address, doesnt mean you were the one using your account at that time.

I'd think that you can only be held liable if you admit to being at fault for organising the meet at the scene of the accident. That is considered evidence.

For once benji you have made sense, hmm alright if I post an event (:P) I'll do it under a blanket so no one can see me or prove it was me. Some mother f**ker broke in posted it and left!!

Haha mat that rule doesn't apply to me, I'm not as... Special as you :P

I would be really supprised official or not that the organiser would get in trouble unless any action they did actually caused a problem.

for example,

if someone turns up, acts like a dick, crashes and kills him self and someone else in the process through no fault of his own, i cant see anyone else being blamed but the driver at fault.

although if the event put attendees or the public in danger through the planned actions, ie maybe stopping a whole bunch of cars in the middle of the road on a blind corner that causes an accident.. well that could be another story, but i think there would be so many loop holes to this that would put blame back onto drivers directly involved for there own actions.

its not like were blocking of roads and using them to race illegally. were just driving from point a to point, people are responsible for them selves...

this is just my 2 cents, and would be very suprised to hear that an organiser had ever been held responsible for anything going down legally in the past where actually activites were legal.

I would be really supprised official or not that the organiser would get in trouble unless any action they did actually caused a problem.

for example,

if someone turns up, acts like a dick, crashes and kills him self and someone else in the process through no fault of his own, i cant see anyone else being blamed but the driver at fault.

although if the event put attendees or the public in danger through the planned actions, ie maybe stopping a whole bunch of cars in the middle of the road on a blind corner that causes an accident.. well that could be another story, but i think there would be so many loop holes to this that would put blame back onto drivers directly involved for there own actions.

its not like were blocking of roads and using them to race illegally. were just driving from point a to point, people are responsible for them selves...

this is just my 2 cents, and would be very suprised to hear that an organiser had ever been held responsible for anything going down legally in the past where actually activites were legal.

So to sum up Ants essay here........... J-RAD stop being a shit stirrer and go organise a cruise :P I did it, no problems and i'm not even a Newcastle Exec :laugh:

Ah well you can be secretary cause you have all the contacts

How's that sounds

Well I do look good in fishnets......

But nah I'm just here for the skids! :woot:

ill do it if u dont wanna jarrad,putty rd it is whos in lol

I wanna do a charity run up there to support the Westpac Chopper but will need to organise that one properly

ill do it if u dont wanna jarrad,putty rd it is whos in lol

There is a putty road cruise on the 16th Dec for members

I wanna do a charity run up there to support the Westpac Chopper but will need to organise that one properly

Yeah that one needs to be done with a lot o planning, will be epic if done properly

me and martin are hunting for roads sat arvo :)

you can do the next one blake :D

Lol skids!!

I might take a run out Dungog Thursday night with Gaz and have a feed at a random pub....

Yep Putty road cruise is good BUT the charity cruise will need some work, I've got a few ideas up my sleeve....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Pads for R32 GTS-t, R32 GT-R non V-Spec (Sumitomo), R33 GTS-t and R34 GT-t are all interchangeable. R34 GT uses a 2x piston caliper, hence it didn't fit.
    • Checked with amayama and nope, the full S2 manual set is not available anymore. Unsurprising, but still disappointing as the ? on availability gave a glimmer of hope.
    • I've heard the Tomei USA head gaskets are decent if you want to o-ring the heads but otherwise not recommended.
    • The 296mm rotors are the R33 turbo brakes. The 310mm rotors are the R34 turbo brakes. The calipers are nearly the same, but not. They're the same caliper but the R34 caliper has longer legs so that it sits out far enough to go over the rotor. The pads are the same for both. When you say, "I bough tsome EBC"....did you just mean pads? Or rotors? 310mm rotors fit under 17" wheels. There may be some wheels without enough clearance though. I can't fit my fingers between the barrel of my wheel and the "corners" of my R34 calipers, but there is plenty of room behind the spokes. This is on Enkei RPF1. You can fit 324mm rotors inside a 17" wheel, but I'd be willing to bet that it would be close to impossible with the Nissan/Sumitomo caliper (using an adapter, of course), because the Sumitomo caliper is fatter than the Brembo caliper that is supposed to go on the 324mm rotors.
    • Hi. Can someone tell me what brakes(and mainly WHERE) can i buy brakes on R34 GTT? I bought some EBC which SHOULD go on my car(i have GT but it has GTT brakes) but it does not fit, Brakes are "too" small(296mm) Are 310mm be good or? I have 17 inch wheel so no "big boys" but for me driving i just need one that fits and i can get here in EU/Czech.
×
×
  • Create New...