Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Fingers crossed mate.

Is the tuner going to hit you up with a free touch up tune?

Haha I hope there'll be some sort of discount - but doubt it. These fellas were pretty quick to charge me for everything single little thing they did. Even things that took 15mins were billed out as a full hour of work. Not sure if I really want to go back there to be honest.

Did try it out with entire exhaust dropped and there was a difference so she's booked in tomorrow for new hi-flow cat. I don't think I've ever heard such insane turbine spool before ;)

That's about right

Well, the new cat is in and I've also straightened out a portion of the exhaust with a dead straight pipe. She feels like they come on a bit sooner....am hoping that I don't regret not going for a set of -7's.

(I'm a sucker for response as you may have guessed)

Regret not going -7? They will be very very little difference between the 2 mate

The problem is somewhere else and not the turbos

Yeh well that's just it - I did about 3-4 months of reading and emailing random peeps to see what these buggers will be like.

I guess there's only one way to find out and that's a re-tune now that there's a better cat and everything has been checked for leaks.

Yeh well that's just it - I did about 3-4 months of reading and emailing random peeps to see what these buggers will be like.

I guess there's only one way to find out and that's a re-tune now that there's a better cat and everything has been checked for leaks.

They for sure dont sound like how they should be peforming, Then again i spent months debating -9s and -5s so what do i know haha :)

They for sure dont sound like how they should be peforming, Then again i spent months debating -9s and -5s so what do i know haha :)

That's exactly it. I guess it's all up to the tune now...need to get that fuel in down low to make more....fumes, and consequently more boost and power. Everyone seems to be saying 16 to 18 pounds by 4000rpm.

So what turbos did you end up going for? The -5's are quite a top end turbo right? The have a much bigger A/R than the -9s?

Went -9 because i came to the conclusion that it would be the most usable power on the streets, no track no drags. End of they day they can always he changed. Still its like naming a child haha

Yes it was stupidly hard choosing between the -7 and -9 units! I came very close to buying -7's and only changed to -9's because peeps say that they give a little bit more up top? Like, they don't run out of puff too early etc.

How do yours perform??

Arent they like a float bearing turbo or is that the 8cm ones?

nothing wrong with bush or floating bearing turbos.

The preload on the actuators can also make a HUGE difference to response on these things, we dial in 10mm minimum on them before install. Just make sure to balance them equally.

check out this GTR with -5's, it picked up 900rpm.

https://fbcdn-sphoto...445052851_n.jpg

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150611091641813&set=a.10150265368356813.328814.728171812&type=1

Well the thing is that I'm already running quite firm actuators that are 15.6psi I think. But I guess the problem lies where the actuators crack. I'll add a little bit more preload to them and see what happens eh?

Maybe that fella in the link who picked up the 900rpm was running very soft actuators?

Well the thing is that I'm already running quite firm actuators that are 15.6psi I think. But I guess the problem lies where the actuators crack. I'll add a little bit more preload to them and see what happens eh?

Maybe that fella in the link who picked up the 900rpm was running very soft actuators?

the ones on that gtr were 15psi ones aswell.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...