Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all im about to put my combo into the car going to run pump fuel atm as im 3 hours from the nearest e85 servo!

Any how my combo is

forged rb26

alot of port work done

276 custom grind cams

VCT

6 boost manifold divided

6766 cea divided .84 rear

45 mm turbosmart gate

Just can not find any info on these turbos on a rb26 like dyno sheets or hp figures id like to know what im getting my self into and where i should be on pump fuel hp wise at the wheels in my gtr.

Thx for any help

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/409170-6766-cea-billet-turbo-on-a-rb26/
Share on other sites

Could be the 1.15 rear end, its a big exhaust wheel as it is so the need for the largest possible housing is debatable.

To OP: are you sure you have enough gate for that setup? I would have wanted 50mm at minimum for a single gate on that setup, I wouldnt be scared of a 60mm either.

Thats a 930hp turbo. These things are known to punch above their weight, are you sure E85 would only see 650?

Correct me if I am wrong but PJ has gone 850whp from a similarly sized unit from a 2L on E85?

im not suggesting 730 on pump is whats to be expected, but A: were talking US pump 93, not skip land pump 98 and B: were talking a US result. US results are always higher than ours, no matter what.

700+whp on US-93oct sounds like heaps alright, dyno discrepancy aside (assuming 10% lower reading that is still not far short of 500kw) - would love to know more about the car.

On the flipside, 650whp on 26-28psi - that doesn't sound that huge if talking about a fairly serious setup (using a PT6766 to its potential is pretty serious by my reckoning). What kind of setups are you talking there? A mate of mine's stock stroke RB26 makes 865hp @ 4hubs on 22psi running on E85, which by my reckoning should equate to at least 770awhp/575kw on a Dyno Dynamics dyno.

Thats a 930hp turbo. These things are known to punch above their weight, are you sure E85 would only see 650?

Correct me if I am wrong but PJ has gone 850whp from a similarly sized unit from a 2L on E85?

im not suggesting 730 on pump is whats to be expected, but A: were talking US pump 93, not skip land pump 98 and B: were talking a US result. US results are always higher than ours, no matter what.

I may be thinking about a different turbo. I'll ask the customer. Still fairly new to identifying PT's

as for the US results, well it's about 540rwkw.... so given US results are always very happy (or ours are conservative??) if it's say 10% out, that's high 400's... have no idea if that's realistic for that setup for not.

randomly found this on a Dutch tuning companies site - PT6765 - 611kw. - not sure if fly wheel conversion or at the wheels.

EDIT: never mind, looking at the other results, it looks like they've done some calc to guestimate the engine power... not very useful then...

R34 GTR, (Eddie, DU)

Sky-Eng gebouwde motor

CP zuigers

Crower drijfstangen

HKS nokkenassen en klepveren

N1 oliepomp

Precision billet PT6765 turbo

Sky-Eng carterpan

HKS twin plate clutch

Bosch 1600cc injectoren

Sky-Eng swirl pot met 2 Bosch 044 benzinepompen

Link G4 ECU

820hp @ 2.1 bar op E85 benzine

US spec 93 is better than our 98 for sure. I would put our 98 closer to US 91, but a little better. There is no direct comparison.

As has been said, 700+ is a big number for pump fuel. Yet im not surprised. Its likely to be calculated engine HP, plus the level of discrepancy that we are used to seeing.

When I saw the result I gauged 450rwkw, which is a walk in the park for a 6766, the only questionable thing is US pump 93 and if its good enough to support the number.

In NZ we have Dyno Dynamics, Dynojets, and mainly Dynapacks - I have considered doing comparisons between those 3 though the results I have seen from the bunch seem to have Dynojets reading marginally lower than the Dynapacks and basically add 8%-12% to Dyno Dynamics results to get Dynojet/Dynapack equivalent results.

We are putting car on my Dyno Jet and on a Mustang in the same day soon just for fun to end the what ifs and I thinks around here will be fun just to see the difference.

I post up the findings.

Edited by Weapon X

Mustang dynos don't seem to read quite as low as Dyno Dynamics dynos with "typical" setups, assuming you don't count the way the Brits tend to set up DD dynos (to estimate Flywheel).

Will be interesting to see the DD vs Mustang comparison

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've looked up the parts number (41011AL501). It's around $700 OEM. Usually our Infiniti G35 here in Canada have interchangeable parts with my Stagea but the parts number are not the same. I have looked around and it seems the JDM 2005 V35 Skyline (which is the same as our G35) has the same caliper but I cannot confirm. And I can't find a repair kit. The inner brake pads drags on the rotor, seems to be rusty piston. Thanks for the info by the way
    • This coupled with 6-9 speed autos with ridiculously short gearing is why these modern shitbox cars always seem so fast off the line. If it wasn't for those things, Raptors would not seem fast. The problem we have is there is a driveability gap between a more gentle take off and a wheelspinning sideways launch. The difference between ankle flex required to achieve one and ankle flex required to achieve the other is about 0.5°.
    • Yeah I think I'm also with the opposite here. It's 'hard to keep up with traffic' because in the real world I'm accelerating with 15% throttle and they are pinning it. It feels like I'm being an overt dickhead at anything above 15% throttle, so the car sounds like I'm being an overt dickhead to keep up with/get ahead of traffic when I'm really just trying to drive with traffic. There would be no issue 'keeping up with traffic' if we used the same level of throttle input/aggression to drive around. People really do just drive around with their foot nearly pinned in econoboxes.
    • To be fair it's the other way around. 300kw is boring in a modern Golf or BMW. They are so competent / well-engineered / devoid of emotion that you have to go stupid fast to feel anything. Whereas the <300kw RB still makes all the right noises and it feels good to drive. Can pull off at the lights with the turbo whooshing and the blow-off pssshing and feel like the coolest kid on the block. Just don't look to the side where you'll see the bored housewifes in their shitbox Yaris/Corolla/Camry that kept up because you didn't go fast at all
    • 300kW is so boring in a Skyline, you'll get spanked by someone's mum's Golf with Alibaba pipes, and an email tune.
×
×
  • Create New...