Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all im about to put my combo into the car going to run pump fuel atm as im 3 hours from the nearest e85 servo!

Any how my combo is

forged rb26

alot of port work done

276 custom grind cams

VCT

6 boost manifold divided

6766 cea divided .84 rear

45 mm turbosmart gate

Just can not find any info on these turbos on a rb26 like dyno sheets or hp figures id like to know what im getting my self into and where i should be on pump fuel hp wise at the wheels in my gtr.

Thx for any help

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/409170-6766-cea-billet-turbo-on-a-rb26/
Share on other sites

Could be the 1.15 rear end, its a big exhaust wheel as it is so the need for the largest possible housing is debatable.

To OP: are you sure you have enough gate for that setup? I would have wanted 50mm at minimum for a single gate on that setup, I wouldnt be scared of a 60mm either.

Thats a 930hp turbo. These things are known to punch above their weight, are you sure E85 would only see 650?

Correct me if I am wrong but PJ has gone 850whp from a similarly sized unit from a 2L on E85?

im not suggesting 730 on pump is whats to be expected, but A: were talking US pump 93, not skip land pump 98 and B: were talking a US result. US results are always higher than ours, no matter what.

700+whp on US-93oct sounds like heaps alright, dyno discrepancy aside (assuming 10% lower reading that is still not far short of 500kw) - would love to know more about the car.

On the flipside, 650whp on 26-28psi - that doesn't sound that huge if talking about a fairly serious setup (using a PT6766 to its potential is pretty serious by my reckoning). What kind of setups are you talking there? A mate of mine's stock stroke RB26 makes 865hp @ 4hubs on 22psi running on E85, which by my reckoning should equate to at least 770awhp/575kw on a Dyno Dynamics dyno.

Thats a 930hp turbo. These things are known to punch above their weight, are you sure E85 would only see 650?

Correct me if I am wrong but PJ has gone 850whp from a similarly sized unit from a 2L on E85?

im not suggesting 730 on pump is whats to be expected, but A: were talking US pump 93, not skip land pump 98 and B: were talking a US result. US results are always higher than ours, no matter what.

I may be thinking about a different turbo. I'll ask the customer. Still fairly new to identifying PT's

as for the US results, well it's about 540rwkw.... so given US results are always very happy (or ours are conservative??) if it's say 10% out, that's high 400's... have no idea if that's realistic for that setup for not.

randomly found this on a Dutch tuning companies site - PT6765 - 611kw. - not sure if fly wheel conversion or at the wheels.

EDIT: never mind, looking at the other results, it looks like they've done some calc to guestimate the engine power... not very useful then...

R34 GTR, (Eddie, DU)

Sky-Eng gebouwde motor

CP zuigers

Crower drijfstangen

HKS nokkenassen en klepveren

N1 oliepomp

Precision billet PT6765 turbo

Sky-Eng carterpan

HKS twin plate clutch

Bosch 1600cc injectoren

Sky-Eng swirl pot met 2 Bosch 044 benzinepompen

Link G4 ECU

820hp @ 2.1 bar op E85 benzine

US spec 93 is better than our 98 for sure. I would put our 98 closer to US 91, but a little better. There is no direct comparison.

As has been said, 700+ is a big number for pump fuel. Yet im not surprised. Its likely to be calculated engine HP, plus the level of discrepancy that we are used to seeing.

When I saw the result I gauged 450rwkw, which is a walk in the park for a 6766, the only questionable thing is US pump 93 and if its good enough to support the number.

In NZ we have Dyno Dynamics, Dynojets, and mainly Dynapacks - I have considered doing comparisons between those 3 though the results I have seen from the bunch seem to have Dynojets reading marginally lower than the Dynapacks and basically add 8%-12% to Dyno Dynamics results to get Dynojet/Dynapack equivalent results.

We are putting car on my Dyno Jet and on a Mustang in the same day soon just for fun to end the what ifs and I thinks around here will be fun just to see the difference.

I post up the findings.

Edited by Weapon X

Mustang dynos don't seem to read quite as low as Dyno Dynamics dynos with "typical" setups, assuming you don't count the way the Brits tend to set up DD dynos (to estimate Flywheel).

Will be interesting to see the DD vs Mustang comparison

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Stock ECU (or more accurately stock tune) absolutely refuses to go over 10psi and behaves like you have seen. The Nistune is the same if it is the stock tune. If the Nistune chip has been tuned, the resulting tune could be literally anything for any combination of parts. The Nistune just makes the stock ECU Tunable.
    • So stock ECU does not like anything above 10 psi?  That Nistune one is just for "try" if it will be any different, I know it need to be tune for that. I know but YOU may know about these problem but i/we dont. They few little Skylines here let alone people who know anything about tham so that is why iam asking here  
    • So now we have a radiator with no attachments whatsoever. It lifts up with a particularly tight spot between the drivers side air box mount and the lower radiator outlet, but if you've got this far you will sort that too. This is the lower mounts with the rad out so you can see where the rubber bushes go, it is a straight shot upwards Done! Assembly is the reverse of disassembly, with blood less likely to be shed.
    • Right, onto the second last trick. The Air Con condenser is mounted to the front of the radiator and stays in the car when the radiator is removed. There are 2x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the condenser to the radiator, remove those The bottom of the condenser is attached to the radiator with clips. You need to lift the condenser out of those clips and clear (up, then forward). f**ked if  could work out how to do that last bit with the front bumper on. I hope you can, and you share the trick.  Bumper removal probably deserves its own thread one day once I've recovered the will to live, but basically you need to remove the wheels, front inner guard liners (clips and 10mm headed bolts), the self tapper between the guard and the bumper at the rearmost point of the bumper (same as an R32 that bit), any remaining clips at the top/front of the grill, an absolute bastard design with a plate that holds the top of the bumper above the headlight each side (only 1 bolt which is tricky to get to, but the plate catches 2 places on the bumper and must be removed....carefully!) and push clips between the bumper and guard under the headlight. If you've done all that you will be faced with wiring for the fog lights on both sides and in ADM Q50 RS at least, 4 nasty tight plugs on the driver's side for the ADAS stuff. So, the clips at the bottom look like this on drivers side (looking from the front) And on the passenger side (also from the front), you can see this one is already out Clearance on both of these are super tight; the condenser needs to move up but the upper rad support mount prevents that, and the radiator can't move down far because it is (rubber) mounted. Once you achieve the impossible and drop the condenser off those mounts so it does not stop the rad moving, you are good to go
    • OK, next the shroud needs to come off and there are a couple of tricks. Firstly, there is a loom from near the passenger side headlight to the fans, coolant temp sensor etc and there is no plug to undo.  In my case I was OK to leave the shroud on top of the engine so I just undid the passenger side fan plug and about 10 of the clips which gave enough free wire to put it aside. The fan plugs were super tight, the trick I used was a small falt screwdriver to push down on the release tab, then a larger flat screwdriver to lever the plug out of the fan unit....be careful with how much force you apply! If you need to remove the shroud altogether for some reason you will have to deal with all the plugs (tight) and clips (brittle)....good luck. I removed all of the clips and replaced them with cable ties that I will just cut next time. Also, in the Red Sport / 400R at least, the intake heat exchanger reservoir hose is bolted to the shroud in 2 places with 10mm headed bolts; so remove them (the hose stays in the car; no need to undo it at the t fittings down at the radiator lower mount. Once you've dealt with the HX hose and the wiring loom, there are 3x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the shroud to the radiator; remove those.   The shroud then lifts out of the bottom mounts where it sits on the radiator, up and onto the engine out of the way. Simples
×
×
  • Create New...