Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Follow this link to seee V35 sedan like no other. (ignore the women in pushup bras at the start, the stagea boys got a bit carried away hahah)scroll down its about 3/4 down the page.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/395458-mv35-stagline/page__st__100

I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder.. but personally, I think that is ugly.. (the car, not the girls..)

Don't want to detract from your dedication though.. i am sure there are many hours worth of work there!

And the standard sedan coupe nose is better how? Atleast i dont have to worry about my headlights going to absolute crap with discolouration of the lenses. But its your opinion your entitles to it.

The only reason i did it was because i had damage on all the front panels besides the bonnet and i didnt want the ugly front so i went withing the nissan FM platorm family to its closest relo the M35 stagea for a new nose

Edited by Howaitonaito

I would have done a coupe nose but i would have needed custom fenders but it just would have looked the same as the factory nose. I respect your opinion i was just pulling ya leg. Opinions are like a@#holes; everyones got one.

Nice work dude.

IMO it works, considering the rear of the sedans aren't quite like the coupes (a bit boxier?), fairly certain it will look better in person too

Just probably won't work with the coupes.

Who knows, you might actually start a new trend?

No different from people with Onevia's / Sileightys etc.

Or even the R34 front conversions for the Stags.

:thumbsup:

I think I like it... need moar pics pls! Looks like the lights were a bitch to align, or is that a test fit?

I actually like the sedan lines and haven't seen this particular front swap done before, so nice one.

Edited by Dreadnought

I like it because it's unique, well done. I do personally think those stagea's are ugly though.

May be ugly but the rozzers ignore us. Anyone feeling irresponsible can peel off a 12-13 sec qtr in front of them & they'll turn around & book one of you P platers for dark tint, lol. Plus we can fit half of your car in the back.

Don't worry, not many of us like v35s... :P

^^^ haha

Mark, I think you've done a fine job on the Stagline. It's unique & you did it your way :thumbsup:.

All that's left is to convert the back two thirds....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
    • Hey man do you have pic of adaptor plate by any chance I need to match up the bolt holes as my gearbox adaptor plate ones are way off the only bolts of starter motor are matching thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...