Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

wet p1 times
01 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1:25.252 20 laps
02 Felipe Massa Ferrari 1:25.455 +0.203 20 laps
03 Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso 1:25.667 +0.415 25 laps
04 Romain Grosjean Lotus 1:26.042 +0.790 21 laps
05 Adrian Sutil Force India 1:26.212 +0.960 24 laps
06 Lewis Hamilton Mercedes 1:26.374 +1.122 19 laps
07 Valtteri Bottas Williams 1:6.456 +1.204 20 laps
08 Kimi Raikkonen Lotus 1:26.614 +1.362 21 laps
09 Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1:26.621 +1.369 21 laps
10 Paul di Resta Force India 1:26.755 +1.503 16 laps
11 Daniel Ricciardo Toro Rosso 1:26.940 +1.688 26 laps
12 Nico Hulkenberg Sauber 1:27.061 +1.809 24 laps
13 Sergio Perez McLaren 1:27.135 +1.883 6 laps
14 Esteban Gutierrez Sauber 1:27.250 +1.998 26 laps
15 Pastor Maldonado Williams 1:27.576 +2.324 24 laps
16 Giedo van der Garde Caterham 1:28.600 +3.348 19 laps
17 Jules Bianchi Marussia 1:28.887 +3.635 14 laps
18 Heikki Kovalainen Caterham 1:29.177 +3.925 14 laps
19 Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1:29.457 +4.205 11 laps
20 Mark Webber Red Bull 1:29.473 +4.221 21 laps
21 Rodolfo Gonzalez Marussia 1:30.314 +5.062 12 laps
22 Jenson Button McLaren no time 6 laps

http://www.planetf1.com/news/3213/8702764/Prac-One

dry p2 times
02 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1:22.825 +0.017 35 laps
03 Mark Webber Red Bull 1:22.891 +0.083 36 laps
04 Kimi Raikkonen Lotus 1:23.030 +0.222 32 laps
05 Felipe Mass Ferrari 1:23.110 +0.302 37 laps
06 Lewis Hamilton Mercedes 1:23.140 +0.332 35 laps
07 Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1:23.398 +0.590 45 laps
08 Adrian Sutil Force India 1:23.840 +1.032 37 laps
09 Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso 1:24.058 +1.250 31 laps
10 Paul di Resta Force India 1:24.104 +1.296 25 laps
11 Daniel Ricciardo Toro Rosso 1:24.175 +1.367 32 laps
12 Jenson Button McLaren 1:24.306 +1.498 35 laps
13 Sergio Perez McLaren 1:24.854 +2.046 31 laps
14 Valtteri Bottas Williams 1:24.888 +2.080 38 laps
15 Nico Hulkenberg Sauber 1:25.167 +2.359 38 laps
16 Pastor Maldonado Williams 1:25.321 +2.513 32 laps
17 Esteban Gutierrez Sauber 1:25.441 +2.633 37 laps
18 Romain Grosjean Lotus 1:25.851 +3.043 35 laps
19 Giedo van der Garde Caterham 1:25.963 +3.155 30 laps
20 Jules Bianchi Marussia 1:26.078 +3.270 31 laps
21 Charles Pic Caterham 1:26.930 +4.122 35 laps
22 Max Chilton Marussia 1:26.970 +4.162 25 laps

Paul di Resta was the only driver not see the end of the session as he parked his Force India with 17 minutes remaining after his rear left completely delaminated. Di Resta was on a set of medium tyres that had completed 11 laps.

http://www.planetf1.com/news/3213/8703463/Prac-Two

  • Like 1

button has, and is continuing to, ruin that team

he will race on for... 5 more years? It'll take at least a couple years to recover

not to overstate it by too much, but mclaren wont be winning anything for a very long time

from having clearly the car of the field with louie, to not one pole or race win this year. they will get nothing

and they deserve it

perhaps this sparks a philosophy change where its racing first again

what's changed, apart from the tuning vanes on the edge of the rad inlets?

not to overstate it by too much, but mclaren wont be winning anything for a very long time

=[

I've pretty much resigned myself to the only McLaren related satisfaction I'll get this year is the reviews of the P1 when journos finally get their hands on it

mcla-butt-sepa-20133-886x590.jpg

mcla-butt-sepa-2013-22-886x590.jpg

look at the side pod, old one.

mcla-pere-barc-2013-21-886x590.jpg

mcla-butt-barc-20131-886x585.jpg

new one, they have changed the tuning vanes on the side as you pointed out and the ones on the top of the side pod as well.

new front wing coming today too.

p3 times times
1 Felipe Massa Ferrari 1:21.901 13 laps
2 Kimi Raikkonen Lotus 1:21.907 0.006 14 laps
3 Mark Webber Red Bull 1:22.044 0.143 17 laps
4 Romain Grosjean Lotus 1:22.069 0.168 13 laps
5 Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1:22.229 0.328 17 laps
6 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1:22.254 0.353 15 laps
7 Paul di Resta Force India 1:22.574 0.673 11 laps
8 Adrian Sutil Force India 1:22.729 0.828 17 laps
9 Lewis Hamilton Mercedes 1:22.740 0.839 24 laps
10 Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso 1:22.759 0.858 15 laps
11 Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1:22.839 0.938 26 laps
12 Jenson Button McLaren 1:23.151 1.250 13 laps
13 Esteban Gutierrez Sauber 1:23.371 1.470 21 laps
14 Sergio Perez McLaren 1:23.373 1.472 13 laps
15 Pastor Maldonado Williams 1:23.385 1.484 17 laps
16 Nico Hulkenberg Sauber 1:23.388 1.487 18 laps
17 Valtteri Bottas Williams 1:23.660 1.759 16 laps
18 Daniel Ricciardo Toro Rosso 1:23.767 1.86 17 laps
19 Charles Pic Caterham 1:24.775 2.874 18 laps
20 Jules Bianchi Marussia 1:24.793 2.892 16 laps
21 Max Chilton Marussia 1:25.135 3.234 17 laps
22 Giedo van der Garde Caterham 1:25.250 3.349 18 laps

http://www.planetf1.com/news/3213/8705805/Massa-Sets-The-Pace-In-Final-Practice

button has, and is continuing to, ruin that team

he will race on for... 5 more years? It'll take at least a couple years to recover

not to overstate it by too much, but mclaren wont be winning anything for a very long time

from having clearly the car of the field with louie, to not one pole or race win this year. they will get nothing

and they deserve it

perhaps this sparks a philosophy change where its racing first again

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You sir are a fool.

JB does have a purpose and we saw it last race out.

He is there to make Perez look competent.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...