Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Did a few tweaks to get new power level:

- Exhaust Cam gear (OS Giken), 5° retard

- Tubular SS exh manifold (didn't make much difference on its own unfortunately)

- Swap to better Matrix mode tune with LT-12 Mictotech from old-style mode (leans out some rich spots I had)

Shaun at BoostWorx did the work, excellent stuff as per usual.

Green plot is old setup. The old power curve indicates better low down power but that's due to different ramp rate on dyno helping to spool turbo earlier, so if Shaun had done that same ramp rate, <3000rpm power with the new setup would have been better.

Not sure why he does that because it can make a dyno plot look like shit at lower RPM??? Anyway, if we have another dyno day, we should make sure ramp rates are the same for all, within reason of course.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/41572-280rwkw-at-12-bar/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Cheers all.

Clint, will also be very interesting to see outright engine vs chassis dyno figures when you're done.

From all accounts it's a linear relationship re engine vs chassis numbers, not a multiple like 1.3 for eg.

So a smallish FWD car might loose 40rwkW through drivetrain whether the engine is pushing out 100 or 200 kW.

A mid size RWD, I have read, is a 50kW drivetrain loss, so for example when I first got my car it had 136rwkW, which = 186kW. Now 280rwkW = 330kW.

For bigger cars like old Falcons, Monaros and also 4WD GTRs, typical losses are 60rwkW.

We'll see as yours is full R33 and GTR running gear is that right? So you might expect 50-55kW loss.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/41572-280rwkw-at-12-bar/#findComment-852429
Share on other sites

Excellent results mate :( I gotta see Shaun real soon....as soon as this damn gearbox goes on AARRGGHHH!!

 

So is this result going from the std manifold with the external gate mounted on it to a tubular one?

Thanks. I have internal gate turbo, so just a swap from stock cast manifold to tubular SS manifold.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/41572-280rwkw-at-12-bar/#findComment-852804
Share on other sites

was it in the exact same position as the stock turbo?, like to one autobarn has, as they are not as good in my opinion looking at the way the runners merge

Yep that's the one, I thought the same re cylinder 5 runner in particular however at the same time I thought it was much better than stock simply by virtue of the larger ID of the runners. Who knows, the extended power range at the top end I now have might not have been achieved with the old manifold. I read around on various forums and the consenses was that three into one from each bank of three was better than six into one. The manifold from Tilbrooks (Mick Stanic...is he still there???) is oen of the best around, but again much more expensive.

Anyway, for the price (less than half of anything else I have been quoted) I'm happy enough.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/41572-280rwkw-at-12-bar/#findComment-853127
Share on other sites

Excellent stuff Lach' :D As per usual, Shaun comes up with the goods.

Our cars are damn near identical in terms of power/torque now mate! I do run more boost (~20-21psi) to make ~ the same power, but that's to be expected with the lower comp ratio. I'm still using the stock ext manifold, but it was cleaned up and port matched.

You'd better be out at the next AIR meet with me mate! We can try and run vs. each other. It'll make a damn good grudge match :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/41572-280rwkw-at-12-bar/#findComment-853986
Share on other sites

Nice result Lachlan.

The manifold at Autobarn looks alot like the trust one, which is around 3 times the price. I agree 100% on the merge the gasses before they hit the turbine housing, and as you say, bigger ID is all good.

At least it will sound alot tougher, I reckon the note is worth the price alone:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/41572-280rwkw-at-12-bar/#findComment-853989
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...