Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am wondering what is it that makes the deep sounding exhaust to a rb20, is it the type of muffler box used or the cannon tip? I have heard some and they sound awsome.

Do i get a rear cannon, with a center muffler, or not center muffler or a hotdog where the center muffler would be?

If anyone knows what brands are best, and if a cannon on the back is what does it that would be awsome.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/417082-rb20-exhaust-note/
Share on other sites

Make sure its a full turbo back to begin with, 3inch minimum and depending on how "legal" you want it depends on how many mufflers. Usually a centre muffler and cannon or straight pipe depending on your desire for the rear :)

Yer i got a threee inch dump atm with a full 3 inch with only a center full with drift pipes at the end and it sound really wraspy of u get what i mean, might try putting a cannon on the rear and maybe a different brand center muffler, i have heard some and they sound really deep sounds good

i believe it has a lot to do with manifolds as well as ive use about 3 different sorts with the same exhaust using a top mount trust one at the moment and the sound.... amazing best ever combined with a screamer pipe GOLD!!!

I have always admired the sound of an xforce system, they use a straight through oval muffler in the middle with a cannon on the back. all 3".

A friend had an almost identical exhaust on his R32 and that was deep like OP says but also had the big RB 6 cyclinder sound about it.

I would pick up a mild steel xforce to be honest, I got mine brand spankers for only 500 and its become almost my favorite part of the car.

Yer i might try switching to a cannon on the rear, and see how it goes the drift pipes sound good but im abit over it, and attracts attention from the po po to haha. I have see a few witb xforce systems and they soud good, and seem like good quality aswell

I have always admired the sound of an xforce system, they use a straight through oval muffler in the middle with a cannon on the back. all 3".

A friend had an almost identical exhaust on his R32 and that was deep like OP says but also had the big RB 6 cyclinder sound about it.

I would pick up a mild steel xforce to be honest, I got mine brand spankers for only 500 and its become almost my favorite part of the car.

agree.. i like my 3inch Xforce muffler on rear..

How loud are the 'out of the box' 3" xforce systems?

I have a large exhaust system and turbo, with a 3inch oval on the end it sounds just right, no droning or attracting attention, but on wot is awesome.

How loud are the 'out of the box' 3" xforce systems?

I have a large exhaust system and turbo, with a 3inch oval on the end it sounds just right, no droning or attracting attention, but on wot is awesome.

it not a throatie sound but a muffled roar.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...