Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi

I recently brought BC Racing coilovers for my GTT.

I have installed them and set the spring preload to 4mm.

I have set the damper 6F 4R.

I can still feel every bump in the road.

Any ideas on how to tune these better and any recommendations on the preload and damper.

Thanks

Gregzy

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/418402-r34-gtt-bc-br-coilovers/
Share on other sites

Your dampening settings are very aggressive. I believe these have ~30 points of dampening adjustment? Try setting it at 15 front and rear and see how it drives.

No problem, will try that tonight, wouldnt it be harder suspension though

what do you know about spring preload?

You need just enough preload on the springs to make them captive.

As for dampening are you adjusting away from full stiffness? This is how you generally adjust coilovers so when you say 6 and 4 I assume that is the amount of clicks off (to the left) off full stiffness.

nah, i count all the way left as 1 then all the way right as 30.

I just done 15 clicks from all the way left.

As for the preload, i followed a video on youtube by bc racing, he loosened the spring all the way, then tightened it by hand until he couldnt anymore, then he measured 4mm and tightened to that.

I really do appreciate your help, thank you.

I recently brought BC Racing coilovers for my GTT.

I have installed them and set the spring preload to 4mm.

I have set the damper 6F 4R.

What spring rates did you get them in? The adjustable damping setting can only do so much.

IMHO the standard BC BR rates of 8kg front, 6kg rear are still pretty stiff for your average roads. I went softer, with 6kg front and 5kg rear, and I've been very happy with the ride and control.

There's some more discussion on the BC BR's on R34 GTT here.

that video is not for the type of coilovers you have for a R34 GTT.

Adjusting damping is dead simple on your coilovers, just follow the directions in the manual that came with the coilovers.

On this note, often its found that setting them to the softest setting on damping doesnt give the softest ride, a few clicks off totally soft in the back and a few more in the front is usually the best.

As for the spring preload, by all means go for the softest possible. To do this basically have the preload as wound out as far as possible and then adjust your ride height by screwing in the mounting cyclinder at the bottom of the coilover.

But beyond all this most of your ride comfort is going to be dictated by your spring rates that are in the coilovers you have bought. Standard BC's for skylines are 8kg front and 6kg rear, which is fairly firm and possibly a bit firm for people used to soft ride as well as driving in areas that have bumpy roads.

Iv got 8kg&6kg in my R33 with the damping up way more than that (recommended above) as well as upgraded swaybars, strut braces and nolothane bushes all around (+18's & low profile tyres). And all this isnt too stiff for me. But this is driven in perth where the roads are alot smoother, melbourne is much more bumpy in the metro area and would certainly be too stiff a car for those conditions...

Edited by jjman

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...