Jump to content
SAU Community

Fs: Bolt On 220 - 230 Rwkw Kit, Tuned Pfc, 550Cc, Z32, Highflow Turbo Also Separate Profec B

SKiT_R31
 Share

Recommended Posts

SKiT_R31 Experienced

SKiT_R31

Posted
Posted

Hey All,

I have everything you need to give your standard RB25 / R33 at least 220RWKW, people have been known to get upwards of 240kW out of this particular turbo.

The PowerFC has been tuned for this setup, it was originally tuned for an R34 (OP6) Highflow making 250kW at the treads, but that setup proved too laggy and the power sacrifice is probably worth it for the 1000rpm quicker spool time, the tune has only been adjusted in the lower rpm with ignition timing removed due to the quicker spool time.

The PFC was tuned with the Z32 AFM and the JECS 550cc injectors, both which were new at the time of installation and have done maybe 10,000kms. The turbo is a GCG R33 highflow (not OP6) with zero shaft play and is a direct bolt on replacement. I have only ever run this turbo on 12psi due to only having the factory dump pipe installed at the time of dyno (and as you can see, holds strong), the turbo is good for 14psi but I never had the chance to run that before the car was written off.

I would recommend the ignition timing be set to 15BTDC, an upgraded fuel pump (040, Walbro 255, GTR, etc), boost controller and FMIC be installed with these components, then this should go straight on the car without issues, tune adjustment on the dyno might yield slightly more power for the less aggressive turbo but as is the tune is safe and reliable.

Pictures are attached, the injectors are still in the engine to keep then clean, i will individually snap lock bag them for postage. Note, the second graph is of the original tune for the OP6 highflow, first is with all the gear listed as dyno'd with a greddy profec b, Bosch 040, generic pod filter, standard coilpacks, ebay FMIC kit and 3" exhaust with stock dump.

I'm after $2000 posted (registered/insured) for the Highflow turbo, Tuned PFC, 550cc Injectors and Z32 AFM with plug



Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 7 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Latest Posts

    • GoHashiriya
      ER34 AT ECU and HKS SLD pins

      By GoHashiriya · Posted

      Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Daleo
      Exemplary Сasual Dating - Real Women

      By Daleo · Posted

      Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • dyl33
      Creative in cabin amp locations

      By dyl33 · Posted

      Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • GTSBoy
      Rear suspension upgrades

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • GTSBoy
      Pillowball/Hardened Runner Hybrid Approach

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...