Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey lads,

My 1992 R32 Gts-t is suffering from what seems to be a dead power window motor of the passenger side window.

Thinking this was a dead power window motor as this car is getting old, I purchased a working order power window motor off the exact same model as mine from a respected user of this site.

After installation, the power window still won't budge. Could there be a fuse or a electronic problem I have overlooked or missed?

This issue is very minor in terms of cars mechanics but very crucial as I can not take the car anywhere with my power window left open.

Any suggestions are welcome.

Cheers!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/422957-power-window-issue/
Share on other sites

yeh mate, more than likely the power window amp has blown, the drivers door is the actual switch box itself, passenger doors there is a black relay box in the door.

Before going out and buying power window motor always test the motors as they are a few parts that rarely break in these cars. its usually the relay boxes.

If your window is stuck in the down position:

1. Remove door card

2. Find connector clip for power window motor

3. Using multimeter, locate your +12v and GND wires (alternatively remove your car battery and place it near the door)

4. Make a connection between the +12V/GND and the connector clip. Make sure you only tap the wires to the connector clip at first because you may make the motor wind down while it is already down. If this happens, just reverse the + and - wire.

Power Window

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...