Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gents,

I’ve got a few little issues that im seeking clarification on – Firstly, Rb26, -9s.

So, Car was tuned with the BOV blocked ( Stock 32 GTR BOV’s)

To cut a long yarn short…. They were unblocked yesterday and Vacuum lines plugged in ect

Way home the car felt real doughy, Had to mash the pedal to get the boost ramping up and was revving out to 7k+ with ease… 2nd gear ect, just felt like it needed much more work to get it up and going

As beforehand quarter throttle would see the boost ramp up real quick, couldn’t go over 6k and keep the car straight, First gear used to be non existant as now I can get upto 5k ish – Its behaving much more like a NA

EBC is still getting the boost to the set 16 PSI – Just feels it’s coming on much later in the rev range.

BOV’s have been blocked back up – I.e. were the plastic caps were in place are now wooden chock and clamp - So there is nothing that’s changed in that respect

Car still feels the same ( ie doughy)…… Sound wise…. I can hear the BOV’s venting….. but backing off on boost it doesn't sound like it used to. am I correct in saying with blocked BOV’s I should not be hearing them vent…..

The only other thing that was changed was blocking the oil catch can and venting it back into intake… That should not effect anything.

Im thinking actuators are craking open to early and need to be wound up.

More then happy for someone to come take her for a drive as its hard to explain…. and maybe Ive just lost my mind.... But it sure feels different.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/426111-lend-me-your-expertise-few-issues/
Share on other sites

So let me just confirm a before and after here..

You had:

Rubber caps on bovs and no vacc lines connected.

Catch catch vented to atmo

Now have:

Wood chocking bovs????????? Vacc lines still connected

Catch can now vent to intake (like stock)

For starters you haven't returned it back to how it was. Secondly, the breathers being connected to intake changes your effective RON and your tune will now be out. The oil mist into the intake stream makes a big difference.

Please clarify the above before we speculate too much.

Catch can was blocked with bottle caps yes. In place are now solid wooden blocks to fit the hole.

Catch can is a long horror story.... Basically was no return to sump... and no breather attached.... Was basically picking up oil and dumping is straight out of the bottom hole onto the ground... We couldn't block that off as is was causing Crank case pressure

So now the head drain to catch can is blocked off, So essentially the head drains back down like stock. and yes it is breathing back into the intake...

is the PCV valve still in place and working ?

Will double check on that one... I think ive confused people with the catch can situation, It has to be a BOV issue.... Don't get me wrong.. Car still has its power.. just much later then what it was.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...