Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im quite interested, what will you do to it? New wheels and tighter rear?

Looking at dyno runs my 22psi is on at just over 5k, how much lower can you make this would you say?

Id love it to come on hard at 4 on the dot if your able to do this?

Also a bit more off boost would be mint.

Keep in mind I have a 1.05 rear so that could go .83 with no ill effects?

This just seems smarter if it will work, saves me 1500 bucks too

The T04Z is good enough for 400rwkws+ on E85. I will be using the .82 SS Alpha turbine housing for this, so you still keep your 1.05 rear just in case. The best is if you can leave the turbo with me for few weeks for me to figure out the best nozzle angles and I will get some dyno runs done with the new housing. My prediction is about 25psi around 4000~4300RPMs, and about 430rwkws. If you don't like the final result, I can send the turbocharger back to you in original housing, no charge.

Sounds like you've got specs in a bit of a knot :P

PT6262, EFR8374 and HTA3586 are probably closest to each other in power potential. HTA3582 is a slight step down in potential power from those 3... I'd look at it like this

Power potential (give or take)

1=) PT6262/EFR8374/HTA3586

2) HTA3582

Response (give or take)

1=) HTA3582/EFR8374

2=) PT6262/HTA3586

Again, general thumbsucks extrapolating from results and comments from people who I've spoken to who have driven the setups - I'd not take it as gospel so much as a general idea of where they roughly stand. I actually suspect the HTA3586 would be slightly more responsive than the 6262 but given my lack of direct experience and knowing the following the 6262 has I'll leave it there.

The EFR8374 is a beast for the response it can provide for the power it can make. The HTA3582 would be ultra responsive, potentially a little more so but again - my lack of direct experience with the EFR means i'll leave that there too and say its just the impression I have from extrapolation.

Lith, I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with you.....I havent seen too many EFR results (most are from race teams - who seem quite cagey about results), but every result/graph I have seen, shows it making similar power to the HTA3582. Your talking about a 82mm exducer vs a 83mm exducer. In reality, there isnt much difference between the two.

HTA3586 / PTE6262 kinda similar.

Edited by Tonba

Lith, I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with you.....I havent seen too many EFR results (most are from race teams - who seem quite cagey about results), but every result/graph I have seen, shows it making similar power to the HTA3582. Your talking about a 82mm exducer vs a 83mm exducer. In reality, there isnt much difference between the two.

HTA3586 / PTE6262 kinda similar.

The inducer has more to do with power than the exducer does, wheel design has also changed the game drastically. 1mm difference in exducer size means very little on todays market.

^ Agree scott, but I STILL have not seen an EFR8374 make HTA3586 power.

Only a little more then the HTA3582 (so little its not really worth mentioning... 10kW maybe?). Does this mean that Forced Performance make a superior billet wheel?? Perhaps?

Edited by Tonba

Lith, I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with you.....I havent seen too many EFR results (most are from race teams - who seem quite cagey about results), but every result/graph I have seen, shows it making similar power to the HTA3582. Your talking about a 82mm exducer vs a 83mm exducer. In reality, there isnt much difference between the two.

HTA3586 / PTE6262 kinda similar.

Fair enough, there is little info out there still and I did offer it as what I've seen - but for what it's worth:

EFR8374 = 62mm inducer, 83mm exducer

HTA3582 = 59mm inducer, 82mm exducer

Inducer has the more significant impact on power production - hence it being used to dictate race classes (ie, 67mm, 91mm etc). Also there are not that many EFR results out there, and the ones I have seen where they are leaned on (a lot of track cars don't - while HTA3582s are more often run to their limit on drag cars) they go past most numbers I see on HTA3582s. For the most part the HTA3582 only slightly outflows a run of the mill GT3582R, whereas an EFR8374 is definitely on another level.

  • Like 1

This might put into perspective - this test was done by a Precision fanboi crowd, both turbos tested to where they stopped making more power and done on an open housing manifold and an open housing CEA PT6266 (next up from 6266) compared with a divided housing EFR8374 still on the open housing manifold (wtf is it with people doing this?) which won't have helped it's performance. You can clearly see that the 6266 makes more power, and I don't doubt that even on a properly matched manifold that while the EFR would have spool better and made more power that it did - it'd have still probably fallen slightly short at peak vs the 6266. Either way, there is no way an HTA3582 is getting near 800whp - let alone on a Mustang dyno. This is at the high end of what you'd expect from an HTA3586!

6266vsEFR_chopped.jpg

Fair enough, there is little info out there still and I did offer it as what I've seen - but for what it's worth:

EFR8374 = 62mm inducer, 83mm exducer

HTA3582 = 59mm inducer, 82mm exducer

Inducer has the more significant impact on power production - hence it being used to dictate race classes (ie, 67mm, 91mm etc). Also there are not that many EFR results out there, and the ones I have seen where they are leaned on (a lot of track cars don't - while HTA3582s are more often run to their limit on drag cars) they go past most numbers I see on HTA3582s. For the most part the HTA3582 only slightly outflows a run of the mill GT3582R, whereas an EFR8374 is definitely on another level.

Im happy to see more results, and more then happy to be wrong.

One of the time attack racers that I know just Changed his turbo to an EFR8374...

HTA3582 - 450kW @ 35psi

EFR8374 - 400kW @ 30psi

HTA3586 - 500kW @ 35psi.

I dont have any dynographs unfortunatly (these time attack guys dont want to tell anyone about power / etc), but these are results I have got so far.

As Far as I know the EFR8374 nailed them both on transient response and matched the HTA3582 for spool. And I also know very well that there is more then a top figure to judge a turbos worth.

Edited by Tonba

Im happy to see more results, and more then happy to be wrong.

One of the time attack racers that I know just Changed his turbo to an EFR8374...

HTA3582 - 450kW @ 35psi

EFR8374 - 400kW @ 30psi

HTA3586 - 500kW @ 35psi.

I dont have any dynographs unfortunatly (these time attack guys dont want to tell anyone about power / etc), but these are results I have got so far.

As Far as I know the EFR8374 nailed them both on transient response and matched the HTA3582 for spool. And I also know very well that there is more then a top figure to judge a turbos worth.

Why did they stop at 30psi with the EFR? Not very like for like, and it is definitely not going to be maxed out at that level

Why did they stop at 30psi with the EFR? Not very like for like, and it is definitely not going to be maxed out at that level

I agree on that. Remember not a drag car. These time attack cars cop a thrashing. Hell, even Sierra Sierra evo only ran 32psi.

I believe the HTA's would have seen more power if pushed harder too. Go to the US and these turbos are pushing 40psi+.

Oh, I also belive that the reason for 30psi is running in a new gearbox / suspension setup, and wanted to get used to the setup before turning up the wick.

Edited by Tonba

Ok. Just pointing out the power numbers you posted aren't really representative on anything if the turbos are not being taken to relative potential... Which is what happens a lot with EFRs given what their intention is. I have no doubt they are capable of more than the 3582

The T04Z is good enough for 400rwkws+ on E85. I will be using the .82 SS Alpha turbine housing for this, so you still keep your 1.05 rear just in case. The best is if you can leave the turbo with me for few weeks for me to figure out the best nozzle angles and I will get some dyno runs done with the new housing. My prediction is about 25psi around 4000~4300RPMs, and about 430rwkws. If you don't like the final result, I can send the turbocharger back to you in original housing, no charge.

This seems like a smart idea, can you change wheels or anything too? Forking out 3k for a new turbo versus you tweaking mine up for a quarter of that seems good. I don't care if it's 500 revs laggier than a new one

This would be very interesting to see. That spool if it can be achieved will be comparable with what you'd get with some of the other turbo choices mentioned, if not better - and it'd be pretty cool in general to see what can be achieved with Stao's VNT setup with a known turbocharger. If it can make a T04Z spool full boost by 4000-4300rpm on an RB25 and be reliable, potential game changer.

I could almost be tempted to get my R33 going again and send Stao an interest turbo to mess with :D

  • 1 month later...

Had a chat to Stao, very knowledgable fellow, basically im thinking about possibly settling with a .82 rear on my turbo to bring it on full boost by 5k. Not sure its worth the 2k extra on a new turbo for 500 revs improvement. Still up in the air lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Does that German restaurant still exist in the old place out the NW end of Goulburn? When I say "out the NW end of"...I am really being vague. It was 1997 when I was last there, and the only point of reference I can recall is that it was on the opposite side of the main drag from the big merino. And when I say "opposite side of the main drag", I don't mean "on the main drag". It was either a couple of streets back from there, or might have even been out in the sticks a bit further. Was an old farm building or mill or somesuch. And when I say "the big merino" I might actually be thinking of a completely different part of town, because I just looked on maps and the big bugger is not where I remembered him to be! The food was good, consisting largely of various German mystery-meat sausage/loaf things and kartofflen.
    • So while the second sentence is completely correct and the whole point of the conversation, the first sentence bears consideration. If this bloke is just hoping to throw big turbos on and drive it around, because there are no helpful facilities at all in his tropical paradise** then he likely has zero chance of even knowing what the TP is on the last column in the stock maps, let alone know whether the ECU is operating anywhere near it or past it. So the point is very very moot. And, per what I said before, at stock boost on those turbos, you may well be off the end of the map. **I'm just back from Vanuatu, so I know exactly what small Pacific nations can be like wrt paradise without requisite facilities. But it's not even that simple. I put a high flow on my car and had to drive it around with a proper tune because of the lack of opportunity*** to put the bigger AFM and injectors into it to allow it to be tuned. I had to turn the boost down to less than I had before, and back off the boost controller's ramp, because it was exploring parts of the map that it didn't drive in before, and really couldn't access for tuning on the dyno either, and so was pinging. It was still well within the last column, because when I first**** set up the Nistune on the Neo I rescaled all axes of the maps to give some more space to explore. ***Family dyno was broken ****This was 13 years ago, and the TIM thing wasn't a thing then and so TP would definitely grow when pushing past the stock tune's limits.
    • Yep, this bit another local owner. I caught it before putting the transmission back into the car, what I noticed was the pressure plate fingers weren't flat and even. It's more obvious with the pull style clutch because the throwout bearing ring was visibly not flat once everything is put together. Nismo should really update their instructions to call out this specific detail. I'm not even sure the clutch as-shipped orients everything properly.
    • It ended up being that orientation of the float hub in relation to the clutch disk, when I installed it, I heard a loud click and being stupid, I decided to not take it a part and check it. The hub didn't properly align with the clutch disk and was causing the issue. Definitely an odd one! Dahtone Racing was able to fix me right up, stand up blokes!      
    • Right, but I'm saying on the stock ECU measured airmass from the MAF is no higher than stock. So it's accounting for the higher flow rate iso-manifold pressure. You just have to keep turning down the boost until you're within the stock tune's load scale. If you run off the end there's no telling what will happen. This does mean there's zero benefit to the turbos you're running vs stock, if anything it's just a straight downgrade because the transient response is worse, you don't even get the ECU's boost solenoid helping to pull the wastegate closed during initial spool, and peak power is only whatever the factory map can give you before you hit the R&R corner. On a -9 I would bet that you would have to change out the wastegate spring once you have a real ECU and you're tuning it for real. I'm not saying this is a remotely ideal state of affairs, it's just a way to keep it driveable until you can get a proper tune done.
×
×
  • Create New...