Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The EMU is always going to be a compromise but it also has the benefit of running like the stock ecu, because essentially it is. Great for us auto owners. If you are running a manual box, the Adaptronic is hard to go past for flex setups simply as it's cheaper than it's competitors.

Have a play around with mixes, you should barely notice 20% 98 mixed into the tank and cold starts would be greatly improved. Worst case it runs a little rich on boost and begins to break down spark. How good are your coil packs?

When you tune at over e40-e50 there is little chance of detonation, unless you are pushing the tune hard.

Adaptronic Select? Is that what the ecu is called? I think I have read about it in this forum recently...

Forgive me for being pedantic but to confirm you are saying that in the cooler months I could add, for example, 5l of 98 to a full tank of e85 (say 65l) to enable easier starting without any fear of engine damage. I have just had brand new split fires installed (today I think) and new NGK plugs were installed less than 200km ago.

It will be fine, just run a little rich which should mask the cold start issues. Try it out, I doubt you will notice any difference driving, just easier cranking. You could possibly run it even richer than that without problems so try a few different amounts of 98 until you work out how much you need. It doesn't have to be accurate...

Normally when you run too rich you could foul the plugs, with high ethanol percentage you won't. Even if the car floods, all you have to do is wait for it to evaporate.

ECUs that look at the oxygen sensor to trim the mixture are running in closed loop. If the O2 is low, they cut a little fuel. If the O2 is high, they add a little fuel. Trying to hit 14.7:1 fuel air ratio (for petrol anyway). This is fine for idle and light load cruise conditions where you can run at stoich.

When you get onto the gas (so pretty much any time you're on boost in a turbo car) these oxy sensors can't cut the mustard - we need to be able to run at richer mixtures but the oxy sensor can't tell you anything about the mixture except that it is "rich". So the ECU stops looking at the O2 sensor and just runs off the fuelling values in the map. That's open loop.

Awesome again, that all makes sense now. Thanks :)

fully featured ecu will fix all the issues even with the auto.

Do you have any recommendations in that regard Trent? Scotty has put a vote in for the adaptronic which I'll have a peek at.

My original intention was to get it tuned for e85 and then bring it over to you for a flex fuel tune as I know you have a long history with the emanage and I remember you mentioning that it would be possible to achieve in another thread.

I have had the emanage ultimate in the car since 2008, the car has been manual for 3 months.

OK, so I spent a lot of yesterday reading through a tonne of emanage ultimate threads and found some information relating to cold start tuning. I might as well list it down here and anyone that can confirm, deny or add to the info can feel free to contribute :)

Please note, this information was taken from many different sources which addressed many different vehicles, therefore it may note be directly applicable to your car or engine. The information is provided for the purpose of discussion only :)

Emanage ultimate cold start info

There are two maps which deal with cold start correction, these are the water temperature map and the air temperature map.

The water temperature adjustment map helps with cold start-up and idle until reaching operating temperature (closed loop).

Jumper 13 pertains to water temp, Subaru users have found that setting the jumper to position 1-2 with give them a temperature reading of -35 degrees celcius lower in comparison to the actual water temp, whereas setting the jumper to open will give them a reading of +5 degrees.

Jumper 8 pertains to the ignition signal(?) voltage, one Nasioc user reported cold start issue solved after changing the jumper from position 1-2 to 2-3 (5 - 12v).

Cold start fixes:

Big injector fix (I think this is similar to what you may have been talking about Scotty?)

This is a direct quote from another forum user on Nasioc:

"...you could always use this formula to get close:(Old injector/New injector) - 1. So if you have 280, and you are going to 550, it would be 280/550=.509 - 1 = -.49. The, you subtract 49 throughout your whole map. When I switched from using the inj scale option to just doing it all in the inj map, that's what I did. I think I ended up right around -46~47 in the areas that were zero to start with. Does that make sense? Not sure what else you would need to tune, as that is quite a large jump going to 800. Might have to pull a little from the airflow map as well, I know that's what morracco did.i was thinking of doing this, mainly because 800cc is a bit too big to scale using the built in scaling..."

Another fix from a Mitsubishi 3000GT board, once again a direct quote

"... Add +15 fuel in the AIR map at the cell corresponding to zero(0) TPS and 1300rpm and make all the other cells on the first row a negative value. This adds fuel right at the point the COLD START routine drops RPMs from 1500 thru to 900. "But a piggy-back cant modify closed-loop operations....". Only partially true. The ECU will learn around it FOR FUELING via fuel trims. However, during the first 180 seconds of COLDSTART the ECU isnt in closed loop so FT's arent applied. Therefore, this works.

If I try and enrich fuel according to engine coolant temp to improve drvability before it's warmed up, the ECU rebels by adding higher negative LTFT's (back to my original -20.3). Otherwise the car seems to be running fine, with 99.9% of the off idle hesitation seems to be dialed out in partial throttle."

OK, that's what I have found so far. Remember that I have only pulled info straight from forums so some or all of it could be untrue but I thought it was worth sharing.

Just a note:

FT = fuel trim

STFT = short term fuel trim

LTFT = long term fuel trim

^ these fuel trims are what the factory ecu uses to adjust fueling as it 'learns'. I spent a little while looking at those acronyms blankly until context placed them for me :)

Harts.

I would assume any decent tuner would disconnect the o2 sensor to tune an EMU, only plugging it back in once the maps are almost set. Otherwise you are fighting the stock ecu the whole way, for fuel and timing...

You will be much better off with a standalone as you know, but it is a lot of coin, and if you are happy to learn the Emanage's quirks they are a good unit. (most days ;))

I must admit that I haven't spoken to my tuner since the issue arose and for all I know the issue is solved but I had some time on my hands and thought I'd do a bit of research and see what you guys thought. I will talk to my tuner today and let you know if there is a change :)

In the meantime I will have look at the adaptronic :D

Edited by stageaharts

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...