Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

First post seems clear

A Customer of Edward Lee's has come on here, seen the posts and decided to angry PM those who have made comment on the "business practices" of Edward Lees.

Sydking has decided to expose the post but not the User/Member.

Unfortuantely for that person there is indisputable evidence of misrepresentation of some of the vehicles on the lot.

That's how I read it ....

First post seems clear

A Customer of Edward Lee's has come on here, seen the posts and decided to angry PM those who have made comment on the "business practices" of Edward Lees.

Sydking has decided to expose the post but not the User/Member.

Unfortuantely for that person there is indisputable evidence of misrepresentation of some of the vehicles on the lot.

That's how I read it ....

actually i was thinking it could be from their employees or even the employer... would a loyal customer have that much angst against ppl with irrefutable evidence?

actually i was thinking it could be from their employees or even the employer... would a loyal customer have that much angst against ppl with irrefutable evidence?

People have been bagging (read: pointing out serious issues with) Edward Lee's for years and somehow they are still in business. I doubt that they would now send PM's to individuals hoping that it somehow helps them.

It would just be some douche bag who goes around driving over tree's trying to make himself feel better because he now has serious doubts about his car.

Nothing more has come of this, i did buy a car from Edwards about 5 years ago or so. but no one is going to know that.

I mentioned in a thread that i think they are dodgy, so maybe the fan boy read that and got upset, Mind you he has no posts before and after my PM.

very odd!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • So for the wide band is a Bosch 4.9 correct for the Link G4+ along with a Can bus? Just get the Link gear or is generic ok too? Eg here: LINK LINK DIGITAL WIDEBAND CAN MODULE WITH BOSCH 4.9 SENSOR : KYP Performance House  
    • Bit difficult to follow. Have a look below and see what the standard R32 layout was like. Note there was a restrictor in place immediately before "turbocharged pressure control solenoid" that, if removed, magically got you 1 bar boost.
    • I might be way off the mark here.. there must be a T junction under the manifold. That takes manifold pressure through a check valve prior to the T, one side splits out to this bleed off orifice, the other straight to the wastegate actuators. 
    • Carrying out some engine due diligence before my first drive in a 260RS that has been in storage for 10+ years, and found two lines that are susposed to be plumbed into the boost control solenoid. One of the lines (the wastegate boost supply line) to actuate the gates, had a bolt in one end blocking it. The other line (main boost signal line) from the very rear of the intake manifold (RB26DETT) and runs up to the boost controller had this pill in the end of it as seen in photos. Other than the obvious (T28 Ceramic turbos might well be cooked)  Can anyone shed any light on if there is any validity at all with this mod, bleeding a constant fixed rate of manifold boost pressure off through this 3mm hole?  Is it deliberate?  Was this a 90s Jap mod done to RB26's? Or has someone just fitted this without any idea of what happens to ceramic T28s if they are not gate controlled?    
×
×
  • Create New...