Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have a series 2 R33 GTS-T which has the optional A-LSD fitted. I would like to remove this as I have an ATS 1.5way Centre for an R200 to run.

Only drama is I don't know what Diff housing/casing I need to swap into the car.

Anyone done this before?

Do I need a GTR diff housing?

A-LSD measures roughly 350mm from driveshaft flange to driveshaft flange and approx 350mm from tailshaft flange to splitline where the backing plate bolts on.

(Very rough measurements taken under the car in the dark in a rush)

Thanks

Jamie

Also does anyone know if the A-LSD specced GTS-T's have the same tailshaft length as the viscous equipped cars. I'm guessing it has to be shorter seeing as the diff is longer?

Thought about it some more. GTR driveshafts are different spline count front memory. This means the either they ran GTR hubs in the GTST uprights (highly unlikely) or the run GTST driveshafts bolted to the stub axle. So in that case it would be more likely I need a GTST viscous diff and half shafts and a normal GTST tailshaft which I'm guessing makes up the difference in length between the GTR diff and GTST diff.

Am I onto the right idea here^?

I went from A-LSD to a Non Vspec R230 diff and it was one hell of a headf&%k... Ended up using the A-LSD Tailshaft Flange in the New Diff, and GTR 6 bolt Half Shafts because luckily I had access to GTR Drive Shafts as well. Then because of the GTR Driveshaft splines being fatter than the GTST ones, I had to swap my wheel hubs for GTR ones as well.

Very annoying few days of working on it :P But now... Nice tight GTR Rear end perfection, locks up nicely with a freshly rebuilt Nismo lsd disc kit in the 1.5 center

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...