Jump to content
SAU Community

Mugabetown - Whoretownin' At It's Worst.


Recommended Posts

Will do better next time i'm sure. Staff member is back from sick leave, no more moving the office but still having to do the same amount of work, stress levels should be way down.

You can photocopy whatever you want mate.............at the end of the day it will all come down to the integrity of the individual / business being reviewed....................they will profile you based upon the information you furnish to them and that will give them lead indicators on what is credible and what is not.

CSI is baiscally coming to reality guys.

Guys like me are fuarked.

Soooooooo..........dividend access shares come at me.

well that's what our lawyer just advised as an alternative structuring arrangement...............I can already see the reaction from my clients........something like this

post-5053-13922665672597_thumb.jpg

Antz brain will have to resolve it...........again

Soooooooo..........dividend access shares come at me.

well that's what our lawyer just advised as an alternative structuring arrangement...............I can already see the reaction from my clients........something like this

attachicon.gifImageUploadedBySAU Community1392266565.662205.jpg

Antz brain will have to resolve it...........again

dafuq? Why?! Can think of a few obscure situations where that could be a vaguely conceivable option...

For those playing at home:

Private companies with accumulated profits may issue a new class of shares to associates of the ordinary shareholders of the private company. These new classes of shares are created and often issued for nominal consideration. They do not carry any voting rights but usually carry the opportunity to receive dividends.

Subsequently, when the accumulated profits of the private company are distributed to the new shareholders, the tax paid is often substantially less than what would have been recognised in the hands of the original shareholders.

Although private companies and their advisors may have a commercial rationale for creating such arrangements i.e. asset protection, estate planning or as a performance incentive mechanism for personnel, the Commissioner will be checking to ensure these arrangements have not been set up for a tax avoidance purpose.

dafuq? Why?! Can think of a few obscure situations where that could be a vaguely conceivable option...
exactly! Plus my clients will not see the value in this and will crystalise unwanted tax implications.
For those playing at home:

Private companies with accumulated profits may issue a new class of shares to associates of the ordinary shareholders of the private company. These new classes of shares are created and often issued for nominal consideration. They do not carry any voting rights but usually carry the opportunity to receive dividends.

Subsequently, when the accumulated profits of the private company are distributed to the new shareholders, the tax paid is often substantially less than what would have been recognised in the hands of the original shareholders.

Although private companies and their advisors may have a commercial rationale for creating such arrangements i.e. asset protection, estate planning or as a performance incentive mechanism for personnel, the Commissioner will be checking to ensure these arrangements have not been set up for a tax avoidance purpose.

straight off the ATO website nice one Tony. This ^ is also why this option may not be a viable one..........as the level of audit risk is significant and although would not benefit a tax advantage it from it, it would create unrecoverable time charged............for something the client would not understand.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • List all of your mods. It sounds like an aftermarket ECU hitting rev limiter. Like a valet mode, or a cold rpm limiter? 
    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
×
×
  • Create New...