Jump to content
SAU Community

R34 GTR Radiator Upgrade

archie1

By archie1,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

archie1 Enthusiast

archie1

Posted
Posted

My R34 GTR cooling system struggles on warmer days duruing extended periods of using the performance (on boost) - not that you can do it for that long on the road these days.

Oil temp isn't the problem as my car has a large engine oil cooler already fitted - stays around the mid 80's most of the time. Looking at previous threads it appears the R34 has a thinner radiator than the earlier models and my problem is pretty common.

The MFD allows you to check the exact water temp which interestingly is a fair bit more accurate than the factory temp guage - ignorance is bliss I suspect on a lot of modern cars with the temp guage indicating "normal" at quite high coolant temperatures.

Temp will get close to 100 degrees when using the boost up big hills on hot days without too much trouble. If I went to a track day I suspect it would be worse. Not a problem to date but pretty hard on the engine.

Any tips for a radiator upgrade? I have emailed PWR and ARE and am waiting for a reply. Jap versions are available at considerable cost $2k+! Are these the go?? Didn't want to spend more than I had to but would like some safety margin in the cooling system for any future mods.

Any help appreciated.

regards

Andrew

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43418-r34-gtr-radiator-upgrade/
Share on other sites
mist Community Regular

mist

Posted
Posted

I remember seeing Koyo aluminium radiators for like around $1k for a R34 GTT... should be similar for a GTR? Jap made, good quality and decent price. Also have seen Trust radiators, don't think they're big enough. Other Jap ones: APEXi, FWIN and ARC (especially) are awesome, but be prepared to pay big $$. ARC radiator has awesome construction and is unbelievably light.

Alternative: can modify ur existing radiator. I had my radiator re-cored to triple cores...runs cooler than aluminium radiators in day-to-day traffic jams, but hotter on the track as it dissipates heat less effectively. works well for the $$, but if I have a bit of extra $$ lying around in future I will buy an aluminium one :(

Abo Bob Grand Master

Abo Bob

Posted
Posted

I've been told that 79 to 82 degrees is the range (well for my GTT anyway). Mine was running at 88 so I've had a new thermostat put in which fixed it.

I'm not saying you need a new thermostat, I'm saying 100 is way too hot. Get a 3 or 4 row. Any good quality radiator shop can help you. I've had custom cores made up for me back in my V8 days and the difference is amazing. Lumpy v8's in Cairns and the NT need hard core cooling.

hard CORE geddit hahahaaha.

but seriously.

Abo Bob Grand Master

Abo Bob

Posted
Posted
they spend a lot more $$ on designing product than aust made, so for the same stuff the jap product SHOULD works better.

Skyline are Jap car at the end.

Man, this argument is old and tired and baseless. It may be true in some circumstances but as a blanket it's no good for keeping you warm.

Aussies can make things world class in a lot of fields. Do you think that maybe the heat encountered here in Australia might prompt people to design good cooling systems?

The most knowledgable person I've spoken to on the subject was in a shop in Alice Springs. They know their cooling out there.

Sydneykid Grand Master

Sydneykid

Posted
Posted

As I previously posted we use PWR, half the price of Jap brand names (as usual) and very effective. Plus if it gets damaged (as in rock through core) they can repair it. They have 2 offf the shelf sizes for race GTR's and we use the smaller (thinner) one with a 650 bhp engine. We run ~20 minute races and in up to 40 degree ambient temperatures. So I don't think you need to worry about their cooling ability. Just in case it is important to you, they have a nice red PWR emblazoned accross the core. :aroused:

So I can't hink of any reason why I would buy anything else. :)

archie1 Enthusiast

archie1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
As I previously posted we use PWR, half the price of Jap brand names (as usual) and very effective.  Plus if it gets damaged (as in rock through core) they can repair it.  They have 2 offf the shelf sizes for race GTR's and we use the smaller (thinner) one with a 650 bhp engine.  We run ~20 minute races and in up to 40 degree ambient temperatures.  So I don't think you need to worry about their cooling ability.  Just in case it is important to you, they have a nice red PWR emblazoned accross the core. :aroused:  

So I can't hink of any reason why I would buy anything else. :cheers:

Thanks for your various posts everyone - haven't jumped in until now as interested in what everyone has to say.

PWR have responded to my inquiry - $795 retail plus freight for a 40mm single core aluminium version which will directly replace the stock one. I assume this is what you are using on your race car Sydney Kid??

If so my engine doesn't make anything like 650hp (and won't even if I launch into further mods) so should keep me well and truly out of mischief!

Will keep everyone advise of the results if/when I take the leap. Cooling capacity is not something you want to be short of in Australian conditions with turbocharged cars.

Its interesting that my car is marginal cooling wise in standard trim - never a problem in my WRX days as they seem to have over engineered cooling systems stock?? Small price to pay for stepping up to the GTR though!

Thanks again.

regards

Andrew

archie1 Enthusiast

archie1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
i just got my ARE dual pass cross flow radiator, uses a 40mm core and is much more efficient than a thicker core with a tank at the top and bottom, top quality work, i wont know how well it works for a while

Interested in how the ARE units perform. They are over $1k but looking at the design, as you say, they are a cross flow, dual pass design which looks superior to the "normal" PWR type top-bottom unit. ARE have never done an R34 if it makes any difference.

Anyone have any thoughts regarding the benefit of either design?? Pic of the ARE unit attached - quality stuff.

Any input appreciated.

regards

Andrew

  • 3 weeks later...
archie1 Enthusiast

archie1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
i just got my ARE dual pass cross flow radiator, uses a 40mm core and is much more efficient than a thicker core with a tank at the top and bottom, top quality work, i wont know how well it works for a while

Fitted this radiator yet Clint??

What do you think??

regards

Andrew

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy
      HK Premier with plans for slight mods, but keeping clean and simple

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 10.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
    • Christof
      HK Premier with plans for slight mods, but keeping clean and simple

      By Christof · Posted

      Thank you so much for the comments.  This is very interesting and gives me some great ideas to think about. Keen to keep it simple and relatively classic looking. That said, i am not too worried about staying 100% period correct.  A little extra performance and relatively good (or improved) economy is just what i am looking for. Ill be keeping any parts i swap out so if i get nostalgic i can always swap it all back in.  Right now just trying to get some good ideas from people in the know (I still have a lot to learn in this space). Thank you again!  
    • dbm7
      HK Premier with plans for slight mods, but keeping clean and simple

      By dbm7 · Posted

      Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 😃  
    • Josh K.
      Crank Motorsports Front Axles

      By Josh K. · Posted

      Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • PranK
      HK Premier with plans for slight mods, but keeping clean and simple

      By PranK · Posted

      Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
×
×
  • Create New...