Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone,

I am putting my 1995 GTR V-spec up for sale.

Silver

18 " alloys (falken 275's)

HKS Valve Controller

Turbo Timer

HKS Piping

ABS

Power steering

Power windows

Power Mirrors

Climate Control

3 1/2" exhaust with CATCO Cat

Intercooler

Active LSD

oil cooler

Nardi Steering wheel

Rego - Jan 2005

$43000 ono

Here are some link, as you can see, it is in excellent condition.

PICS: skylinegtr3l.jpg

skylinegtrl.jpg

skylinegtr2l.jpg

Thanks

Marianne

  • 2 weeks later...
hi people,  

 

Just wondering if people are not interested in GTR's anymore or is there another reason why they are not selling??

 

Just curious...

Marianne

Being a 'specialist' skyline forum people here can be pretty anal about prices. The car looks nice, genuine and clean.

The only negative (although not one in my eyes) is the lack of modifications.

I for one would love to buy the car but dont have 40k available.

33 GTR's and vspecs to boot are a specialised car for specialised buyers. Many people just won't part with $40k for a 9 year old car.

I think you'll have to be patient and wait for that genuine person with 40k who wants a clean stock silver 33 vspec.

Guess what Im trying to say is its a special car that will attract special buyers, that maybe few and far between.

Make sure u advertise in a variety of places/media.

I am putting up a challenge to sell this car:

$500 reward for the person that sells it for me over $40,000

$500 only if the car sells over $40K (doesnt matter how much over 40K it goes for)

This is a serious reward, but please only refer serious buyers who are looking for a GTR.

Once the car is sold I will give $500 (within 5 days) to the person who referred the buyer (either in cash or direct into an accout)

Does this interest anyone?

Thanks

Marianne

interesting ... I am selling my 97 gts-t to buy a 95-96 vspec gtr ... 40k seems like a decent price ... 30,000 km's seems a little low.... if it was a better colour i would probably take it off your hands before you could say YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

  • 3 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...