Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

I decided to change the factory double din head unit over to something that requires the standard ISO connector. The info from google seemed to contradict itself, or Nissan decided to use more than one style of factory connector.

Anyway, I pulled the head unit out to see what exactly was in my car, and it didn't look like any of the harness adaptors I saw, picture attached.

I rang Aerpro and they told me they do not stock an R33 to ISO lead at all :(

Has anyone come across this before, is there someone selling an ISO adaptor for this style of connector?

Thanks for any help.

Mike

post-16979-0-48318100-1385615815_thumb.jpg

post-16979-0-48318100-1385615815_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/435644-r33-factory-head-unit-connector/
Share on other sites

Ok, an update..

That connector is not the right one, after much digging around I eventually found the two connectors which are part of the factory head unit harness.

For those that are attempting to install a new head unit that uses the ISO standard, you will need an AERPRO APP-0120. which is described as "Suit Nissan 1995 on".

The only issue I had was that the main connector, which supplies battery, switched ignition and illumination there is also meant to be a ground wire, which mine didn't have installed by the factory, so my new head unit wouldn't power up. It might pick up the ground when the head unit is screwed in to the original metal bracket, dont know, as i was testing it on my car seat before fitting everything back in..

And for reference, my Skyline is an R33 Series 2, so I don't know if this applies to the S1.

Mike

I bought my adapters from supercheap. Weren't 100% right. I had to swap constant 12v and accessory I think, and the antenna power pin was in the wrong position but that wasn't important to me.

Ok, strange, because with the APP-0120 I didn't have to alter any of the connections.

Now the only issue is the way the installers that fitted my amps years ago ran the speaker connections. Instead of running the speaker outputs for the front speakers direct to those speakers, they spliced in to the clarion loom. Took me hours to work out why the fronts would stop working when i plugged in the new loom adaptor, lol.

Mike

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
    • Hey man do you have pic of adaptor plate by any chance I need to match up the bolt holes as my gearbox adaptor plate ones are way off the only bolts of starter motor are matching thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...