Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

PRICE: $1200 ono without afm and pods

LOCATION: Fraser coast

CONTACT: txt 0438016754

DISCRIPTION:

today I have a fully custom rb26 twin high mount setup for sale! the kit includes

2x custom high mount manifolds

2x custom dump pipes

1x custom Y pipe

2x custom intake pipes (rougher quality compared to the rest of the kit)

2x custom oil return hard lines custom and very accurate

1x custom intake Y pipe

2x great condition rb26 r32 stock turbos with minimal to no shaft play

fully custom water and oil lines with lots of speed flow fittings

can include twin z32s and pod filters to match for extra

also has any other parts you can think of for the turbo setup that I may of forgotten

this kit is an extremely custom rb26 twin turbo high mount setup that all lines up perfectly and works extremely well, the kit it currently bolted up to my rb26 setup so visual inspection is available along with seeing the car drive, a deposit will be required before removal of the setup

the waterlines are a fully custom setup with a lot of speed flow fittings and a few cheaper fittings because they ran out of speed flow fittings at the shop, a few of the lines where damaged when I ran them a bad way but there is no leaks or anything just visual damage.

I am upgrading to a large high mount single turbo setup so I will consider swaps for a large genuine turbo or a nice single turbo manifold for a rb26

post-97958-0-40460900-1387717710_thumb.jpg

post-97958-0-15058900-1387717725_thumb.jpg

post-97958-0-32344800-1387717735_thumb.jpg

post-97958-0-59356300-1387717754_thumb.jpg

post-97958-0-13161600-1387717797_thumb.jpg

post-97958-0-30120100-1387717863_thumb.jpg

post-97958-0-30266500-1387717868_thumb.jpg

post-97958-0-45670300-1387717873_thumb.jpg

post-97958-0-37255200-1387717913_thumb.jpg

post-97958-0-98403500-1387717918_thumb.jpg

post-97958-0-98403500-1387717918_thumb.jpg

post-97958-0-90951200-1387717922_thumb.jpg

post-97958-0-62492100-1387717931_thumb.jpg

post-97958-0-79961400-1387717941_thumb.jpg

post-97958-0-42207600-1387717915_thumb.jpg

post-97958-0-53253500-1387717927_thumb.jpg

Edited by rb26 r33
  • 1 month later...
  • 4 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...