Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not sure, but why would you bother?

Best thing to do is rip off all the plenum parts, and the lower runners, and clean the whole lot thoroughly as there will be a LOT of built up carbon down the runners. You will need to make a scraper to clean the head ports out. Doing this will give you all your top end back. You will go through a lot of carb cleaner so buy a box... You might want some oven cleaner/gasket stripper to help remove the built up gunk.

Deleting the vac operated swirl valve before the head might increase power a little at the expense of a little cruise economy.

Deleting EGR would help keep the lot clean so you don't have to do all this work again, again at the expense of cruise economy.

Main reason is just to squeeze a bit more power out of the engine. I know i should have gone for the 350GT if i wanted power but can't argue with the price i got my 250 for. Already have a z tube and a K&N drop in. Will try giving the inside of the plenum a clean, but any idea if the 350GT spacers would work?

They don't give power gains from my experience, and modding the engine without first maintaining it properly is a little backwards imo. You will gain more power changing to a synthetic oil than the spacer can ever give.

Stick the stock air panel back in firstly, or at least a cotton element as you have already taken a backwards step. You might want to clean your AFM element too, now you have most probably sprayed a fine mist of K+N oil onto the hotwire...

Ztube does absolutely nothing, other than make the intake louder. It is just a bit of pipe, were you expecting gains from it?

Done. Replaced with a standard one from Ryco. Got some new oil for it as well, full synthetic. The current oil is looking pretty minging.

No not at all, and if there were any they'd be so minimal i wouldn't feel it. A lot of other people have reported close to 5-8% gains with a spacer, so i was just curious.

Some have done dyno runs to show the benefits of the space on the 3.5L engine, so there are some gains there, not sure if that would translate into any gains on the 2.5L DD engine though.

the Z tube is absolutely just for sounds though.. after all the 350Z produces the same power/torque as the 3.5L engine in the V35.

Here is the direct injection intake assembly that creates swirl in the chamber, it essentially shuts off one intake valve at high vacuum. (idle/cruise) You can see how cleaning or preferably removal of this assembly would benefit power production. It's the first thing I would be doing if I had a dd in service. Followed by a turbo. :P

post-63525-0-37557600-1390309100_thumb.jpg

post-63525-0-67603000-1390309115_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So for the wide band is a Bosch 4.9 correct for the Link G4+ along with a Can bus? Just get the Link gear or is generic ok too? Eg here: LINK LINK DIGITAL WIDEBAND CAN MODULE WITH BOSCH 4.9 SENSOR : KYP Performance House  
    • Bit difficult to follow. Have a look below and see what the standard R32 layout was like. Note there was a restrictor in place immediately before "turbocharged pressure control solenoid" that, if removed, magically got you 1 bar boost.
    • I might be way off the mark here.. there must be a T junction under the manifold. That takes manifold pressure through a check valve prior to the T, one side splits out to this bleed off orifice, the other straight to the wastegate actuators. 
    • Carrying out some engine due diligence before my first drive in a 260RS that has been in storage for 10+ years, and found two lines that are susposed to be plumbed into the boost control solenoid. One of the lines (the wastegate boost supply line) to actuate the gates, had a bolt in one end blocking it. The other line (main boost signal line) from the very rear of the intake manifold (RB26DETT) and runs up to the boost controller had this pill in the end of it as seen in photos. Other than the obvious (T28 Ceramic turbos might well be cooked)  Can anyone shed any light on if there is any validity at all with this mod, bleeding a constant fixed rate of manifold boost pressure off through this 3mm hole?  Is it deliberate?  Was this a 90s Jap mod done to RB26's? Or has someone just fitted this without any idea of what happens to ceramic T28s if they are not gate controlled?    
×
×
  • Create New...