Jump to content
SAU Community

DBW on stock crossover plenum rb25 neo


Recommended Posts

Hey again guys, this is probably a silly question but can someone explain to me why it would be impossible/not smart/wouldn't work to have a Bosch DBW kit connected up to the factory plenum on a rb25det neo that's running a Haltech elite 2500?

If it could work does that mean the old IAC and AAC unit could be removed and blanked off allowing removal of a bunch of coolant lines?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could make up a kit for yourself. As you'll be making it up yourself, the world's your oyster as to how you achieve this. 

I'm eventually going to run DBW on the factory manifold as well. I'm keeping my eye on this kit so I can have all the hard work done for me. 

https://outsidergarage.com/products/complete-rb-r32-dbw-adapter-kits

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SandyBill said:

Hey again guys, this is probably a silly question but can someone explain to me why it would be impossible/not smart/wouldn't work to have a Bosch DBW kit connected up to the factory plenum on a rb25det neo that's running a Haltech elite 2500?

If it could work does that mean the old IAC and AAC unit could be removed and blanked off allowing removal of a bunch of coolant lines?

There is nothing inherently wrong with the idea. You are correct that you can remove/blank off the intake air regulator/AAC valve on the side of the OEM plenum. You will need to replace the OEM accelerator pedal with a DBW pedal and retune an Elite 2500 to suit. The barrier as far as I can tell is more practical than anything else as there's no easy kit to do what you're asking for. Most people seem to go aftermarket manifold if they're going to bother with DBW. Personally not a fan of most plenums out there but if I had to pick one it would probably be this one which appears to extend the runners more than most kits out there:

 image.thumb.png.06a9f77937d52182bc17eda28b189901.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Murray_Calavera said:

You could make up a kit for yourself. As you'll be making it up yourself, the world's your oyster as to how you achieve this. 

I'm eventually going to run DBW on the factory manifold as well. I'm keeping my eye on this kit so I can have all the hard work done for me. 

https://outsidergarage.com/products/complete-rb-r32-dbw-adapter-kits

That's what I thought as well haha, ooh I'm amazed at how much interesting stuff is coming out of the states for the Neo now.

Would something like the https://www.platinumracingproducts.com/products/platinum-racing-products-drive-by-wire-pedal-throttlebody-kit-to-suit-nissan-r-chassis?variant=43977399075048

Be a good starting point. I can't find any data on how this kits pedal actually goes into a 34 accelerator bracket though.

Edited by SandyBill
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

There is nothing inherently wrong with the idea. You are correct that you can remove/blank off the intake air regulator/AAC valve on the side of the OEM plenum. You will need to replace the OEM accelerator pedal with a DBW pedal and retune an Elite 2500 to suit. The barrier as far as I can tell is more practical than anything else as there's no easy kit to do what you're asking for. Most people seem to go aftermarket manifold if they're going to bother with DBW. Personally not a fan of most plenums out there but if I had to pick one it would probably be this one which appears to extend the runners more than most kits out there:

 image.thumb.png.06a9f77937d52182bc17eda28b189901.png

I'm glad to hear I'm not crazy thinking of it, I'm in the same boat with the FFP, I do like the look of the plazmaman but it doesn't appear to have any benefits besides accessing the spark plugs and tidying the open bay up a bit. It's cost/gain ratio lacks and I don't want to be putting that hole through the side of the battery tray. 

The Rajab unit looks nice and compact to still access the fuel side of your strut tower etc! Cheers man

I really like the idea of going DBW the the stock unit and removing some of that potentially obsolete engine control gear.

Edited by SandyBill
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SandyBill said:

really like the idea of going DBW the the stock unit and removing some of that potentially obsolete engine control gear.

Has been done by a member here, can't remember his alias but essentially the DBW flange was welded onto the stock plenum and all the OEM laggy leak valves were deleted.

He's since sold the car. 

I dare say the OEM plenum with an DBW throttle would out perform the fancy stuff.

I know I know, I talk tough with OEM plenums and pushing 400kW out of unopened stock motors but I don't have either of them on my car 😂😂😂

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 19/01/2023 at 7:42 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:


I know I know, I talk tough with OEM plenums and pushing 400kW out of unopened stock motors but I don't have either of them on my car 

Add Samsonas to that list brah.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SandyBill said:

That's what I thought as well haha, ooh I'm amazed at how much interesting stuff is coming out of the states for the Neo now.

Would something like the https://www.platinumracingproducts.com/products/platinum-racing-products-drive-by-wire-pedal-throttlebody-kit-to-suit-nissan-r-chassis?variant=43977399075048

Be a good starting point. I can't find any data on how this kits pedal actually goes into a 34 accelerator bracket though.

Looks like a good starting point. 

If your keen on it, best bet would be to chat with PRP and see how the peddle bracket mounts up. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

As is all the Platinum Racing stuff, Plasmaman, etc etc. There wouldn't be too much product being made in the US (or by US outfits) that is an actual new idea. Almost everything has already been done in Japan, Australia and NZ.

Yeah very true 🫡, I was just mainly referring to how much custom fab stuff they have on the sites over there that we usually have to make ourselves or go to a shop to get done. Like different blank plates for things that aren't commonly blanked and ally intercooler piping kits to use the factory holes. I guess cause it's like it's 1998 over there and it's all exciting as a newer skyline gets released into the wild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Has been done by a member here, can't remember his alias but essentially the DBW flange was welded onto the stock plenum and all the OEM laggy leak valves were deleted.

He's since sold the car. 

I dare say the OEM plenum with an DBW throttle would out perform the fancy stuff.

I know I know, I talk tough with OEM plenums and pushing 400kW out of unopened stock motors but I don't have either of them on my car 😂😂😂

This is what I wanted to hear! Cheers mate, it'll be interesting and I'm going to do it 😏

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Murray_Calavera said:

Looks like a good starting point. 

If your keen on it, best bet would be to chat with PRP and see how the peddle bracket mounts up. 

Cheers buddy I'll give them a bell and see what they say. 

 

I'll keep this thread going with info/pics and work I do or get done 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SandyBill said:

I was just mainly referring to how much custom fab stuff they have on the sites over there that we usually have to make ourselves or go to a shop to get done. Like different blank plates for things that aren't commonly blanked and ally intercooler piping kits to use the factory holes.

Actually, that more reflects the major difference between the way US car guys modify and the way that Aussies modify. They are absolutely allergic to having to fabricate anything themselves. If they cannot buy it off the shelf, preferably as a complete bolt on kit, they don't do it.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Actually, that more reflects the major difference between the way US car guys modify and the way that Aussies modify. They are absolutely allergic to having to fabricate anything themselves. If they cannot buy it off the shelf, preferably as a complete bolt on kit, they don't do it.

Haha I never thought of it like that so true!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, robbo_rb180 said:

For the pedal a 350z/g35 pedal bolts up no need for the bosch pedal and can be bought for much cheaper.

I preferred drilling 2x new holes next to the original ones to move the pedal more to the right.

Then a bit of a Thai massage on the vice to lower the pedal and it's better than OEM 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...