Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nope Racespec your wrong , go and have a look at the old Garrett Cataloge PDF . Cartridge or CHRA no is 700177-23 . Its also shown in the new cataloge (turbobygarrett) BUT only in the comparison sheet . Its the third of the three GT3071R types listed as 420 , 425 and 450 Hp . This is a generic cartridge that you option housing kits for if it comes from Garrett . ATP will sell a complete unit with optional housings .

No one has offered it yet but there's nothing to stop you using the comp cover off the GT2871R 56 T which is .60 ARR T04B .

700177-13 is GT30 turbine + 76mm 60Trim T04S compressor .

700177-14 is GT30 turbine + 82mm 56 Trim GT40 compressor .

Cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03
  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I've got a GT30R To go on a RB20 and I am abit worred it is going to be to big and laggy???.

Specs are .7 front cover 58mm wheel and rear housing 0.63 56mm wheel.

Dont know why i was sold such a big front cover? and it is internerly gated,

Any one got any idear when it would come on boost and what have other people got on there RB20's, what kind of power will it make-230 or so on 1 bar?

It would be great if any one could help me out, Thanks

Wolverine

The unit you are refferring to is either

CHRA 700177-13 GT3076RL

Compressor

60 Trim

59.03mm

CHRA 700177-14 GT3082RL

Compressor

56 Trim

61.36mm

Thanks

Tarek

RACESPEC

hi tarek

that pdf i sent you a few weeks ago has the GT3071R version that disco is referring.

No problems. With the gate fully open, the most boost it will make is 4psi, max.

dude,

that's no good. if you're making boost with the gate completely open, then there is a restriction on your exhaust side, maybe the VG30 exhaust housing doesn't flow all that well when matched with the GT30 turbine.

what should I look at to correct this? Maybe drop the cat for an initial test?

Maybe the wastegate hole isn't big enough?

Mafia,

having a look at the exhaust system first off would be a good option as this area has been found to restrict engine power and turbo gas flow.

if this doesn't help, then maybe look at the wastegate exit area on the turbine housing.

Hiya all,

Got a Stagea RB25DET with Attessa 4wd system.

Currently got 141kw at the 4 wheels, currently upgrading intercooler, entire fuel system, and afm at the moment. Im after around 200kw at the 4wheels.

Opinions on GT30 turbos for the RB25... which would be best, for a heavy wagon which is used for the family car, as such. Either a full rebuild of my standard R33 series 2 turbo, with full GT30 internals, from ATS for $2100 in liue of the GCG rebuild, or the GT3071R as per spec below......

Opinions? Thanks heaps ppl's, Brendan

(ps - this turbos are on ebay for $1700aus)

GT3071R (84T) with internal wastegate 430-450 hp

Turbine:

-56.5mm w/ 84 trim

Housing:

-0.64 or 0.86 a/r (GT28 inlet and outlet flange)

-Internally Wastegated (No Actuator)

-T3 5 bolt discharge 0.63 and 0.82 A/r available shortly Email us for ETA

Compressor:

-Wheel: 71mm w/ 56 trim (GT30)

Housing:

-.50 a/r TO4E

-Inlet: 2.75"

Do us a favour and email them for the ETA on the internal gate .82 a/r???? ;)

The seller is on ebay, known as "Roguepi" located in Sydney....

I thought it was an intresting price at $1699 plus delivery, brand new, and there are 4 different spec options at that price.

But wondering if I'd be better off rebuilding my 'spare' series 2 R33 turbo upto GT30 spec for an extra $400. (Spare as in I got jipped by a forum member stating that it was a R34 Neo turbo - bugga, big bugga!)

Brendan

  • 1 month later...

i am waiting hear some thoughts about the "ultimate wastegates" from a turbo dealer that has ordered one.

cubes, are you sure a GT3071R would only get going at 4500rpm?? i would have banked on them being a pretty neat match with ok response.

Doesnt get going until 4500rpm on a rb25det.

Looks interesting, I wonder how it really flows :S

http://www.atpturbo.com/root/releases/release103105.htm

Hmm interesting indeed. But lit looks as if the tapering may introduced some turbulence in the wastegate gases?

Edited by Busky2k

there will be turbulence for sure, perhaps not dissimilar to a combined dump. however for simplicity if there is no substantial drop in performance (granted there is some loss) this might be a neat and easy solution.

does anyone know exactly the cost to performance of combined vs split dumps?

Hello All

JUST SOME UPDATED NEWS for you all

1.

I have ordered the ULTIMATE WASTEGATE, to have a look at it, they have been behind in production, its been sent, should have by the end of the week

This actually only suits the ATP housings that they have cast up

2.

T3 Internally Gated Turbine Housings SHOULD be available in MAY

3.

I have a BRAND NEW VG30 Turbine Housing being cast up here in SA, ready for production late JANUARY

Thanks

Tarek

RACESPEC

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...