Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im going to get my front facing inlet manifold and exhaust manifold ceramic coated and the exhaust manifold port matched and cleaned up.

Where would be the best places to mount temp probes on both manifolds to measure before and after temp changes, dont really want to run temp probes on each runner.

I have a mate that is doing the coatings and port work and wants to show the benefits of the work done.

Real world results of both gas temp and engine bay temp of the coatings and port matching. Plus of ofcourse the cosmetic improvement.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/442941-temp-probe-placement-on-manifolds/
Share on other sites

I put my ex temp probe into the turbo housing, just near the flange. Easier than manifold given manifold was on car but turbo was off. In your case, with manifold off car, other side of matching flange would be equivalent. Note that any sort of divided (split pulse) manifold, such as the stocker is, makes it hard to get a single measure of the whole flow. That's another reason mine is on the turbo.

I do have what may be a sensor port on the hks exhaust housing, would this be for a temp sensor? And will a jaycay temp sensor hold up to the temperatures or will it just cause problems?

Will the sensor there give a good indication of the benefits of hpc coating and port flowing?

I would of thought that the manifold wouldnt get as hot if it were ported and flowed as edges that exist and catch the hot gas get hot, so if these edges were not there the hot gas would not affect the manifold metal as much, albeit fairly minimal

If I were going to buy an exhaust pyrometer probe, on its own (as in, not part of a package with the gauge or whatever) then I would go to IPA (Industrial Thermocouples Australia) and just get one made up. You can get a type k thermocouple in a 3mm inconel sheath, sheath bent 90° or straight, whatever length of flexible tail, braided or in silicone, whatever plug you want or bare wires, for bugger all cash. Top quality industrial grade stuff rather than the pot luck you might get from eBay.

The Jaycar TC would be OK, but why mess about when proper stuff is not much more?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...