Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I purchased a set of brand new Bilstein B6 dampers for my R33 approximately 4,000km ago. Obviously these are not height adjustable, but are complemented by a set of King Spring 'Lows' to give the car a slightly lower CG and better looks.

I would like to machine some circlip grooves for the lower spring perch to further lower the car approximately 15-20mm. I understand the relationship between height and handling, so no need for an explanation on that.

My question is, does lowering a gas-charged shock absorber which is still relatively new pose any danger as far as shortening its life or causing damage to the valving/internals? Obviously the dampers compression stroke would be reduced, and this is my biggest concern as far as longevity and durability.

Cheers!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/444304-lowering-bilstein-dampers-damage/
Share on other sites

15-20mm is too far. SK's kit B6s (of which I have just installed a set of 4 on my R32) have extra grooves machined in above and below the original pair. These are only ~5mm apart, so you get about an extra 10mm up and down.

I found that Kings lows (KDFL-101 and KDRL-102) sat my car ~30mm too low even when setting the spring perches in the highest grooves. I had to go to GTR springs KDFL-116 7 KDRL-87SP and set the perches in the bottom original slot in order to get the ride height perfect (in line with both what SK recommend and what is also legal in SA). That gives me about 355mm at the front and 350 at the rear.

There is no way that a lower CG and looks is worth compromising the handling of the car that much by dropping it as far as you are asking for. How high is it now?

  • Like 1

Well try this for a trick. Put the car on full lock (ie turn hard left) and stick your head under the guard. Look to see how much shock travel you have at the current ride height. If you like you can try and measure the height between the top of the damper and the bottom gof the bump stop. Then have a think about how much travel you will have when the ride height is 20mm lower......

Cheers guys.

GTSboy, the car is currently sitting at roughly 345mm both front and rear. I actually had a set of grooves machined to my specification to give the car an extra ~5mm of forward rake. I was thinking of going an extra 10mm lower to 335 front and rear.

djr, I'll have a look today, but you're both probably right, 20mm lower will be excessive.

I'm still interested in my original question though, does operating a new damper in the final few inches of its travel cause damage to the valve stack, piston or any other components?

Agreed. Provided it doesn't hit the internal bump stops you're OK. The actual position in the travel doesn't determine the way the damper operates at all. The valving is all about piston speed.

Way back in the way backs, when we used to lower HQ (and similar) Holdens until the front crossmember was ploughing grooves in the road, you'd buy dampers (sorry, back then they were shockies) with a shorter body simply so they'd run closer to the middle of stroke and avoid the internal bump stops.

Of course we usually had air shockers in the rear.......

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You’ll want to have the block drilled and tapped to suit 1/2in head studs and the head for the same. How much power do you intend to make?
    • Sorry for resurrecting an oldish thread Not much has happened in the past year since the last update. The car did another 1000 miles or so and failed the MOT for the first time in October (failed on tyres which had been advised for a couple of years) In October the car got put up for sale and was removed in November due to no interest, being so close to christmas it was to be expected. The roads were dry in February so I decided to tax it early and get the new tyres fitted.   Fast forward to April, I got someone in to give the car a good clean after sitting for the winter.                                 The car got re-advertised and today (Saturday 3rd May) the car sold. The new owner is planning a GTR conversion at some point and a respray in the same pearl white. It's bitter sweet, it's a shame to have the car sit there for half the year and then only do 1000 miles. The kids are growing too quick and space in the back is getting limited. It's been a great 6.5 years of ownership
    • And if you want more power, more reliably, and cheaper, go get the Aussie RB... The 4L Barra and put that in instead.
    • No cats will keep discolouring the rear bar. Sends white paint a weird yellow stain. Cut and polish normally gets it out, but you'll be doing that every fortnight I found.
    • Both heads will be equally reliable or unreliable depending on what you do to them.  Stock the RB26 head will flow more. You have access to the stock intake ITB manifold on the RB26 cheaply which flows really well(1000hp+).   Arguably more aftermarket support for RB26, though in Aus we love our RB30 SOHC heads too.    The only downsides to the RB26 head is if you have a VL commodore and want to keep the SOHC look.  Where you may have an issue is drilling out the rb30 block for the bigger head studs but if you are building a big power motor you'd probably put bigger studs on the SOHC head too.  This is just about finding a good machine shop, sometimes easier said than done.  RB30 head worked can make big power just like a Rb26 head, so really it actually more comes down to what your preference is for your car.  People now even making billet versions of both.
×
×
  • Create New...