Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello i was pumping up my tyre and i noticed what looked like black paint or like someone has drawn a line with a black permanent marker on the chrome lip of my rim, it is shiny and black does not feel like a scratch cos if i run my finger over it i carnt feel it at all but it looks like a black mark on the chrome lip, the lip is also slightly dipped in so if i got too close to something the scratch would be on the bit that sticks out more and not the bit that dips in, i tried to clean it with solvents and then with polish but nothing removes it. And i just dont understand why it is black for cos it is on chrome and as i said you carnt feel it at all running your finger over it, so does anyone know why it is like this? and how do i fix it

post-229-14030389276813_thumb.jpgpost-229-1403038964528_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/444581-lenso-rims-scratch/
Share on other sites

I'd say its painted chrome which is usually painted over a black base ,in which case the paint has scuffed through....I have a wheel the same, is painted black chrome...you can't really fix it though you could try repaint the area, it might come up ok.

btw the way carnt is not a word, the word is Can't , its an abbreviation for can not ;)

I'd say its painted chrome which is usually painted over a black base ,in which case the paint has scuffed through....I have a wheel the same, is painted black chrome...you can't really fix it though you could try repaint the area, it might come up ok.

btw the way carnt is not a word, the word is Can't , its an abbreviation for can not ;)

That "cannot" be right ;)

That "cannot" be right ;)

man I actually checked that, well by checked i mean I asked the wife cause I couldn't rememeber, is cannot 1 or 2 words...she said 2, she's the one who reads books all the time, so I took her word for it..I just read car forums and most people here have worse grandma than me...

but for the sake of clarity

http://www.dailywritingtips.com/cannot-or-can-not/

we are both right ;)

Mick you are still wrong mate, back to school you go carnt!

lol and i now know what the black is, it bugged me on how it hot in the lip cos the lip is dipped in on the middle and i have worked it out, it is not paint that came off and black under it, someone had rubbed there tyre onto my rim and that is rubber transfer cos it can be scratched off with an abrasive and its chrome under it but no solvent will touch it at all for some reason, and using abrasive will take the clear coat off which im not worried about cos i have white stone chips all over the clear anyways so looks like i have to polish all the clear coat off all the chrome and thats a massive job

man I actually checked that, well by checked i mean I asked the wife cause I couldn't rememeber, is cannot 1 or 2 words...she said 2, she's the one who reads books all the time, so I took her word for it..I just read car forums and most people here have worse grandma than me...

but for the sake of clarity

http://www.dailywritingtips.com/cannot-or-can-not/

we are both right ;)

Mick you are still wrong mate, back to school you go carnt!

BA (hons) (usyd)...cannot :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...