Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Just wondering when the standard turbo spools up. I havn't actually looked at the turbo to make sure it is standard but i guess it would be.

Anyway it spools up at about 3500-4000rpms. I thought it would be a bit earlier.

Is there anyway to advance the spool up?

I installed a FMIC yesterday and it didn't make heaps of difference. It made it feel more punchier, as in, it hits full boost at once rather than building up.

anyway there seems to be a pretty big flat spot in 2nd when i hit 75km -90km and then 90-100 is good. I heard that resetting the ecu every so often can improve these problems but not sure as I havn't done it yet.

I think a powerfc is next on the agenda.

JaFF

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44549-slow-spool-up/
Share on other sites

R33? Flatspot? Running too much boost.

 

Stick around 10-11psi.

 

3500-4000rpm for a R33 stock turbo is way to high.

Thats around the territority of the ol' RB20 running 1 bar or so. (Depending on driving conditions)

I have a R33 S2 and it spools between 3500 and 4500 running standard psi...goes like a dream for me...advan is puttin it up to 10psi for me in couple of weeks and throw it on the dyno and see wats goin on...but i dont see a prob with mine

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44549-slow-spool-up/#findComment-910391
Share on other sites

it goes well. just a lil flat in spots. mainly in second gear- higher revs.

I have a boost controller which is set to 10psi but dont use it daily.

now i have the fmic i probably could run at 10psi. Might try later. Just have no where to test the car properly. 70km speed limits all the way from work to home :D

Was just interested to see whn it should spool up.

JaFF

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44549-slow-spool-up/#findComment-910399
Share on other sites

it goes well. just a lil flat in spots. mainly in second gear- higher revs.

I have a boost controller which is set to 10psi but dont use it daily.

now i have the fmic i probably could run at 10psi. Might try later. Just have no where to test the car properly. 70km speed limits all the way from work to home :D

Was just interested to see whn it should spool up.

JaFF

ive got a stock intercooler and i hae no probs...i get low boost at over 3500rpm then the baby kicks at 4500rpm nicely ...il b interested to see wat happens wen advan puts the boost controller on at 10psi wen at stock boost it goes this well all ready...just pick a straight quite road at night and test it like i did lastnight u can really see how well it runs in the cool air of the night ...im way impressed

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44549-slow-spool-up/#findComment-910405
Share on other sites

uhh, i probably mean hitting boost like 7psi at 3500

I spose it kinda builds up b4 then. havn't taken much notice. since the fmic it seems to hit all of a sudden at 3500. gives that sinking feeling. I just thought it should come on full boost earlier.

still i think i want to get an electronic boost controller (only have turbosmart single stage atm), i've heard they handle things a bit better.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44549-slow-spool-up/#findComment-910743
Share on other sites

Hey Jaff.

I had a similar problem on my R32 when my ehaust manifold gasket blew out. the turbo just seemed to take longer time/higher revs to start pumping out decent gas. in case you're curious my car made a horrible noise coming from the manifold on startup, sounded like a tractor? weird. give it go before you shell out big bucks. good luck.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44549-slow-spool-up/#findComment-911163
Share on other sites

meh to rb20det all round..

JaFF: sounds perfectly normal.. One way you can reduce the spool up is to add an exhaust camgear (i noticed a fair change with this in), get cooler air in (shield pod, or air feed it), reduce rotational mass (flywheels, etc), also try reducing the backpressure of your exhaust system will probably help.. maybe a dump pipe or get it heat wrapped. Electronic Boost control also helped mine spool up a tiny bit quicker (or at least smoother).

I think the smoother and faster the engine revs to a certain point, the quicker the turbo will spool. There is probably proper physics there somewhere which somebody can explain.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44549-slow-spool-up/#findComment-912107
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...