Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys I'm after a replacement intake plenum.

Once the engine is warm and the butterfly's in the plenum runners open it make a some wild knocking or tapping sounds so I think the intake is stuffed.

Does anyone know where I can find a new one.

Thanks rossco

I have a spare VQ25 DD intake, not sure if they are the same, but I doubt the intake could make those kinds of noises. I suspect your cam advance mechanism has failed on one side or the other.

If you try unplugging one of the blue plugs on the front of the engine to see if the noise goes away, if it doesn't, try the other blue plug. (Note: you will need to clear the code afterwards)

Thanks for the reply.

We had the mics on the intake and it's coming from the dead center of the intake.

but ill check with the plugs to see if it goes away but it only come one you apply power

  • 3 months later...

For all those that is interested the noise had nothing to do with the butterfly in the manifold.

It was the left bank variable cam timing spring.

One damn spring was 450 bucks.

and was a huge job to do. So we unplugged that bank. And running no vct.

For all those that is interested the noise had nothing to do with the butterfly in the manifold.

It was the left bank variable cam timing spring.

One damn spring was 450 bucks.

and was a huge job to do. So we unplugged that bank. And running no vct.

I fix it in situ using S/H parts, takes a couple of hours. Pretty common issue with the 2.5 and 3L.

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi All,

Sounds like I have the same problem on my 2004 RX250 Stagea, Its got the VQ25DD and has 197000 on the clock.

Mechanic has looked at the car and unplugged the left hand sensor, fixed the noise but car has the engine light on now and is running sluggish.

Does anyone know of a sure fire way to check if it is spring or just the sensor playing havoc with the valve timing?

My mechanic here in NZ has said the parts alone for the spring job are over $500.

Would like to have it confirmed that is the problem before parting with that kind of cash.

Thanks.

Simon.

It will be the cam actuator assembly hitting the end of it's travel, not necessarily the spring. Do you know what grade of oil your mechanic was using? I usually try a thicker oil before swapping parts, as the camshafts need the correct grade to work properly, they could also need a re-learn.

$500 for the parts sounds cheap if they are new, the job may be quoted much higher if you include labor, it's quite a job to replace, especially if he wants to drop the engine.

Hi Scotty,

Thanks for the reply.

Have checked the last service sheet, oil used is 10w40 semi synthetic.

Is a relearn something my mech can do with his diagnostic comp or is it specialised?

$500 was just for parts, reckons entire replace with labour could be over $1100.

Worth a shot with the oil first.

Would this be the reason my screen on the Navi system has said PIT since getting the car in February???

That oil grade should be fine, but for the cost of an oil change without filter a thicker oil could be worth a try. I doubt his aftermarket diagnostics could reprogram the cam actuation, you need a Consult 3 unit to do a lot of these higher level diagnostics.

Has it been banging long? If so the assembly could be damaged anyway.

The PIT symbol is just a service reminder, it doesn't know there is something wrong afaik.

Scotty, you are a star.

It staggering the amount of info that you contribute to this site.

Thank you so much.

May be damaged as was knocking from about May till i got it serviced in July.

Roughly 5000k's

I'll try to find someone with a Consult 3 unit, after an oil change.

Will let you know if this has worked.

Thanks again.

Simon.

No worries Simon.

I am able to change these assemblies through the front cam cover, where the blue plug is. It's not something I would suggest to someone who has never pulled a DD apart before, but I could help your mech with basic directions if he needs them. He will likely want to drop the front cover though, it would be the best way to do the job right.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...