Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey dudes,

I installed a K&N pod on the weekend and now I hear sexy noises! But no power increases. In fact below 3000rpm it seems more slugish. After 4000 it seems a lot smoother then before but still very little gain. I'm putting it down to evil hot air.

Could anyone with a cold air partition/intake give details of what they've done, how much it cost and performance increase??

Another thing, I can now hear the BOV nosies but it makes a pssshht sound. I've heard a few BOVs that make a kkkksshhhh sound (sounds tougher). Any ideas what brands make this noise???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4574-new-pod-good-sound-but-less-power/
Share on other sites

Originally posted by adam 32

yeh itll be because of the hot air

i made a partition out of aluminium for my car, cost me a $10 (for sheet aluminium) and an afternoons work, pretty simple

i havent noticed any difference with the pod on, but the filter is always cold so i guess its working...

$10 sounds like its worth doing. Do you have a cold air in take?? I left the stock one on which must help but obviously not enough.

nah i dont. i didnt think it neccessary, theres cold air coming in from around the headlight. the disadvantage of running a pipe closer to the ground to duct cold air is moisture and excessive dirt from being closer to the road...

put in the partition and see how it feels. if still no good, then maybe youll need an intake as well

Originally posted by KILLER-T

My air box cost me a carton of beer to get the stainless cut and a afternoon to fit it i got the templates from here or sdu just do a search on airbox.

He he he, good to see people using the CAI template that I put up for everyone to use.

How do you find it KillerT??? Was the design pretty close for your car and pod filter???

If anyone else wants to see the web site, it's here:

http://www.users.bigpond.com/jayson77/

Originally posted by KILLER-T

Thanx Jay the template was a BIG help saved me heaps of time and it fits perfect i used some 5mm foam tape that i got from Clark rubber to seal it to the car    

:)

That's great, you did a great job of putting it in. Looks sweet.

It puts a big smile on my face when I know I've helped someone out and it's come out that good.

Cheers

Jayson

Originally posted by R33

riggap: refer to the Carbon and Fibreglass Airbox offerings from UAS as seen in the For Sale > Business section.

10% discount to forum goers

Thanks, but for $10 I think I'll make it myself.....

IF ITS WORTH THE EFFORT???? What sort of power increases can I expect?

Adam & Jay,

I'm not too sure from the picture of Adam's set-up but does the compressor outlet pipe run through the boxed section? This pipe radiates a LOT of heat! For this reason I made my box/shield with a section molded around the comp' outlet pipe so it's outside of the boxed area, & with enough of a gap to stop as much radiated heat as possible..

During testing on the dyno (3 runs with bonnet down nil airflow into CAI) the temp's inside the boxed area were measured @ 25'c lower than on the eng' bay side. Measuring the comp' O/L pipe surface showed temp's well over 80'c.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 100% the factory sender is tapered, that is how it seals (well, that and teflon paste or tape)
    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
×
×
  • Create New...