Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have universal Momo rails, its as easy as welding some tabs onto them.... then a touch up with gloss black paint.  

When welding though i would make sure its a neat fillet weld (preferably TIG) , using some flat bar, (i think it was 40 x 5mm) you would hate to have a big'n and the seat mount shear!

ive seen some nice clean close to fillet welds with a mig - depends on who does them n how they know how to use it!

but yeah this is a good idea

or just drill some new holes in the floor :)

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I can tell you Recaro don't make rails to suit R33. I ended up using the rails that were on the seat (minor adjustment at one bolt site to fit R33) hahaha! I welded up brackets to adapt to the R33 mounting points........it was a real pain

I fitted a set of Saas seats to my 33 gtst that i got through repco, and they had rails you could get through them for about $250.

Did the rails you got have the drivers seat belt holder attached to it?? Thats the main part thats a pain to play around with. Which repco did you get em off?

Looks like the Bride rails are the go at the moment

  • 3 weeks later...
Guest darrinspencer
Already got my bride which is the whole frame and not just the tracks.

Tose nismo ones are just the rails with dont help as you need the whole frame

They are made for R33 which means they will have the rails and mounting feet to bolt straight in as shown in the picture. You would only need to weld 2-off 30x3 flat bar across the rails to pick up the seat mounting points and seat belt buckle

Alot easier than making the whole frame from scatch and cheaper too.

if you pulled out your front seats you would know it is not that simple. Also the drives side seat belt buckle is apart of the rail frame also, which my bride seat rails have. What about sliding mechanism? you would have to stuff around with that also with those rails.

The brides i have and are getting made up you just bolt the seat to the frame and then to the floor plan and it fits perfectly.

Guest darrinspencer
if you pulled out your front seats you would know it is not that simple. Also the drives side seat belt buckle is apart of the rail frame also, which my bride seat rails have. What about sliding mechanism? you would have to stuff around with that also with those rails.

The brides i have and are getting made up you just bolt the seat to the frame and then to the floor plan and it fits perfectly.

I actually had my seats out last week-end to clean them. I have made seat rails before and realise what is envolved. It is not that hard.

"What about the sliding mechanism"- what do you mean? that is the part of the rails

For the seat belt buckle mount, all you need is a metal braket weld to the rail/cross rails to bolt to the buckle.

I will find you a better picture of these rails.

Guest darrinspencer
bride%20seat%20rail.jpg  

Thats the rails and frame i got for mine.

much less stuffing around with welding etc, and straight fit.

The generic rails i had look like the ones in the other pic but the seat did not sit up the right height or straight.

Here are some pictures of what they look like

These ones are for fixed back seats because they have the bolt on side brackets to mount the seat.

You can see the seat belt buckle bracket fitted to the rails

The other rails are similar to these but need the 30x3 flat bar fitted across the rails to pick up the seat mounts

You do need to use the "generic" rails that come with most aftermarket seats like yours.

Regards to welding and stuffing around, aren't you getting your bride copies made anyway witch require more work and cost than using the ones I suggusted?

That was my point.

The generic ones i had could not be adapted properly to fit the r33 floor plan and didnt sit the seat how i wanted.

Yes i am getting the brides copied as a striaght fit option by an engineering shop as most people dont have their own welding equipment/knowlegde to modify the other rails properly.

So once you add freight to the cost of each rail from america (they are quite heavy) plus additonal welding and metal needed they come up to a similiar price in the end.

Guest darrinspencer
The generic ones i had could not be adapted properly to fit the r33 floor plan and didnt sit the seat how i wanted.

Yes i am getting the brides copied as a striaght fit option by an engineering shop as most people dont have their own welding equipment/knowlegde to modify the other rails properly.

So once you add freight to the cost of each rail from america (they are quite heavy) plus additonal welding and metal needed they come up to a similiar price in the end.

The rails are $82.24 per side plus 5% credit card fee

That equals $172.70 plus freight from Japan approx $50

$10 for 2m of steel bar

1.5 hour labour to weld up cross rails and selt belt brackets $90

Total cost $322 pair

Better than $475 pair??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...